From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"anshuman.khandual@arm.com" <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Devmap cleanups + arm64 support
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 13:53:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190704135332.234891ac6ce641bf29913d06@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190704195934.GA23542@mellanox.com>
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 19:59:38 +0000 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 11:53:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:35:51 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > Let me know and I can help orchestate this.
> > >
> > > Well. Whatever works. In this situation I'd stage the patches after
> > > linux-next and would merge them up after the prereq patches have been
> > > merged into mainline. Easy.
> >
> > All right, what the hell just happened?
>
> Christoph's patch series for the devmap & hmm rework finally made it
> into linux-next
We're talking about "dev_pagemap related cleanups v4", yes?
I note that linux-next contains "mm: remove the HMM config option"
which was present in Christoph's v3 series but wasn't present in v4.
Perhaps something has gone wrong here.
> sorry, it took quite a few iterations on the list to
> get all the reviews and tests, and figure out how to resolve some
> other conflicting things. So it just made it this week.
>
> Recall, this is the patch series I asked you about routing a few weeks
> ago, as it really exceeded the small area that hmm.git was supposed to
> cover. I think we are both caught off guard how big the conflict is!
I guess I was distracted - I should have taken a look to see how
mergable it all was.
It's a large patchset and it appears to be mainly (entirely?) code
cleanups. I don't think such material would be appropriate for a late
-rc7 merge even if it didn't conflict with lots of other higher
priority pending functional changes and fixes!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-04 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-23 15:03 [PATCH v3 0/4] Devmap cleanups + arm64 support Robin Murphy
2019-05-23 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm/memremap: Rename and consolidate SECTION_SIZE Robin Murphy
2019-05-23 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm: clean up is_device_*_page() definitions Robin Murphy
2019-05-23 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: introduce ARCH_HAS_PTE_DEVMAP Robin Murphy
2019-05-23 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: mm: Implement pte_devmap support Robin Murphy
2019-05-24 18:08 ` Will Deacon
2019-05-24 18:38 ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-27 6:23 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-05-28 13:46 ` [PATCH v3.1 " Robin Murphy
2019-05-29 10:03 ` Will Deacon
2019-06-26 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Devmap cleanups + arm64 support Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-26 12:31 ` Mark Rutland
2019-06-26 15:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-26 15:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-27 3:35 ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-04 18:53 ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-04 19:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-04 20:53 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2019-07-04 21:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-05 15:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-04 20:54 ` Robin Murphy
2019-07-04 21:13 ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-05 11:16 ` Robin Murphy
2019-07-04 23:37 ` Dan Williams
2019-07-05 12:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190704135332.234891ac6ce641bf29913d06@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).