linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
	Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Subject: [patch V2 21/25] x86/smp: Enhance native_send_call_func_ipi()
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 17:52:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190704155610.325211809@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20190704155145.617706117@linutronix.de

Nadav noticed that the cpumask allocations in native_send_call_func_ipi()
are noticeable in microbenchmarks.

Use the new cpumask_or_equal() function to simplify the decision whether
the supplied target CPU mask is either equal to cpu_online_mask or equal to
cpu_online_mask except for the CPU on which the function is invoked.

cpumask_or_equal() or's the target mask and the cpumask of the current CPU
together and compares it to cpu_online_mask.

If the result is false, use the mask based IPI function, otherwise check
whether the current CPU is set in the target mask and invoke either the
send_IPI_all() or the send_IPI_allbutselt() APIC callback.

Make the shorthand decision also depend on the static key which enables
shorthand mode. That allows to remove the extra cpumask comparison with
cpu_callout_mask.

Reported-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
V2: New patch
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/ipi.c |   24 +++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/ipi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/ipi.c
@@ -83,23 +83,21 @@ void native_send_call_func_single_ipi(in
 
 void native_send_call_func_ipi(const struct cpumask *mask)
 {
-	cpumask_var_t allbutself;
+	if (static_branch_likely(&apic_use_ipi_shorthand)) {
+		unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
-	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&allbutself, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
-		apic->send_IPI_mask(mask, CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
+		if (!cpumask_or_equal(mask, cpumask_of(cpu), cpu_online_mask))
+			goto sendmask;
+
+		if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask))
+			apic->send_IPI_all(CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
+		else if (num_online_cpus() > 1)
+			apic->send_IPI_allbutself(CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
 		return;
 	}
 
-	cpumask_copy(allbutself, cpu_online_mask);
-	cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), allbutself);
-
-	if (cpumask_equal(mask, allbutself) &&
-	    cpumask_equal(cpu_online_mask, cpu_callout_mask))
-		apic->send_IPI_allbutself(CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
-	else
-		apic->send_IPI_mask(mask, CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
-
-	free_cpumask_var(allbutself);
+sendmask:
+	apic->send_IPI_mask(mask, CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
 }
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-04 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-04 15:51 [patch V2 00/25] x86/apic: Support for IPI shorthands Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:51 ` [patch V2 01/25] x86/kgbd: Use NMI_VECTOR not APIC_DM_NMI Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-05 21:43   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:51 ` [patch V2 02/25] x86/apic: Invoke perf_events_lapic_init() after enabling APIC Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:51 ` [patch V2 03/25] x86/apic: Soft disable APIC before initializing it Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:51 ` [patch V2 04/25] x86/apic: Make apic_pending_intr_clear() more robust Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-05 15:47   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-05 19:06     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-07-05 20:17       ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-05 20:36       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-05 20:39         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-07-07  8:27           ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-05 19:19     ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-05 20:47       ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-05 20:25     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-05 20:37       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-07-05 20:49       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-05 21:16         ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-07  8:37         ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-09 14:43           ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:51 ` [patch V2 05/25] x86/apic: Move IPI inlines into ipi.c Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:51 ` [patch V2 06/25] x86/apic: Cleanup the include maze Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:51 ` [patch V2 07/25] x86/apic: Move ipi header into apic directory Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:51 ` [patch V2 08/25] x86/apic: Move apic_flat_64 " Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:51 ` [patch V2 09/25] x86/apic: Consolidate the apic local headers Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:51 ` [patch V2 10/25] x86/apic/uv: Make x2apic_extra_bits static Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:51 ` [patch V2 11/25] smp/hotplug: Track booted once CPUs in a cpumask Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:51 ` [patch V2 12/25] x86/cpu: Move arch_smt_update() to a neutral place Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:51 ` [patch V2 13/25] x86/hotplug: Silence APIC and NMI when CPU is dead Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:51 ` [patch V2 14/25] x86/apic: Remove dest argument from __default_send_IPI_shortcut() Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:52 ` [patch V2 15/25] x86/apic: Add NMI_VECTOR wait to IPI shorthand Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:52 ` [patch V2 16/25] x86/apic: Move no_ipi_broadcast() out of 32bit Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:52 ` [patch V2 17/25] x86/apic: Add static key to Control IPI shorthands Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:52 ` [patch V2 18/25] x86/apic: Provide and use helper for send_IPI_allbutself() Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:52 ` [patch V2 19/25] cpumask: Implement cpumask_or_equal() Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:52 ` [patch V2 20/25] x86/smp: Move smp_function_call implementations into IPI code Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:52 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2019-07-05  1:26   ` [patch V2 21/25] x86/smp: Enhance native_send_call_func_ipi() Nadav Amit
2019-07-04 15:52 ` [patch V2 22/25] x86/apic: Remove the shorthand decision logic Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:52 ` [patch V2 23/25] x86/apic: Share common IPI helpers Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:52 ` [patch V2 24/25] x86/apic/flat64: Remove the IPI shorthand decision logic Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:52 ` [patch V2 25/25] x86/apic/x2apic: Implement IPI shorthands support Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190704155610.325211809@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).