Re: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Print error code while kthread_create failed

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>]

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 08:38:00AM +0000, Bernard Metzler wrote:

> Right, I agree with Leon. Better remove all those printouts. We
> already have a warning if we cannot start any thread. Also
> stopping those threads is not worth spamming the console. I just
> forgot to remove after Leon's comment. Would it be possible
> to apply the following?
> 
> Thanks a lot!
> Bernard.
> 
> From e4ca3d4dec86bb5731f8e3cb0cdd01e84b315d80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:03:17 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] remove kthread create/destroy printouts
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com>
>  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_main.c  | 4 +---
>  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c | 4 ----
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_main.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_main.c
> index fd2552a9091d..f55c4e80aea4 100644
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_main.c
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static void siw_device_cleanup(struct ib_device *base_dev)
>  
>  static int siw_create_tx_threads(void)
>  {
> -	int cpu, rv, assigned = 0;
> +	int cpu, assigned = 0;
>  
>  	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>  		/* Skip HT cores */
> @@ -99,9 +99,7 @@ static int siw_create_tx_threads(void)
>  			kthread_create(siw_run_sq, (unsigned long *)(long)cpu,
>  				       "siw_tx/%d", cpu);
>  		if (IS_ERR(siw_tx_thread[cpu])) {
> -			rv = PTR_ERR(siw_tx_thread[cpu]);
>  			siw_tx_thread[cpu] = NULL;
> -			pr_info("Creating TX thread for CPU %d failed", cpu);
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  		kthread_bind(siw_tx_thread[cpu], cpu);
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
> index 2c3d250ee57c..fff02b56d38a 100644
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
> @@ -1200,8 +1200,6 @@ int siw_run_sq(void *data)
>  	init_llist_head(&tx_task->active);
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&tx_task->waiting);
>  
> -	pr_info("Started siw TX thread on CPU %u\n", nr_cpu);
> -
>  	while (1) {
>  		struct llist_node *fifo_list = NULL;
>  
> @@ -1239,8 +1237,6 @@ int siw_run_sq(void *data)
>  			siw_sq_resume(qp);
>  		}
>  	}
> -	pr_info("Stopped siw TX thread on CPU %u\n", nr_cpu);
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }

Okay, I took this patch to for-next, thanks

Jason