From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFFDC7618F for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 19:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5279B2077A for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 19:39:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1563219542; bh=AlW6HkTDyi9y78GOHB4XOb2nGkPZNzF4LHvHjb5p0fc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=v1px9I7PB8fufmTqkzOD3w1rjcvEpB23fdfyb2pYo/xsgH7F5syoREMrS+oBy9VA9 xlRlyl2f5Hpoi2oGljr278fCXSb4xTdQUq6ODEAJSdIL/lw5nBAHHrGM3FzPj1tGFP 8jt3NJToK/XDsTT2XsopRjKrUGLUoWEoQIfBsYFg= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731328AbfGOTjB (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 15:39:01 -0400 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:33948 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730362AbfGOTjA (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 15:39:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sirena.org.uk; s=20170815-heliosphere; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=uEtSh3X6xQ1lITiuNz9x5IdXNtqfNQ17vMJkyrNs1LY=; b=xhH0p1EXjiOkPBx2ciKgSWD71 u82dCi2hbyODuxO1uD0AIUppV8S/kASktp6GzA0pvZVBIBRjSO0Y0JF7eT/71rL66NWAZSpUCPURZ Fn4rq67eYTNi5AjqGx17ZndeOaQtXV3j/YS/R78oQwOof/eNXxXEHD+jPULJP+irjSSCI=; Received: from cpc102320-sgyl38-2-0-cust46.18-2.cable.virginm.net ([82.37.168.47] helo=ypsilon.sirena.org.uk) by heliosphere.sirena.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hn6o6-0002Mz-PI; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 19:38:42 +0000 Received: by ypsilon.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3C51B2742A1F; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:38:42 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:38:42 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment_P=E9ron?= Cc: Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Linux-ALSA , devicetree , linux-arm-kernel , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-kernel , linux-sunxi , Jagan Teki Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Allwinner H6 SPDIF support Message-ID: <20190715193842.GC4503@sirena.org.uk> References: <20190527200627.8635-1-peron.clem@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Fremen add life to spice! User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 09:21:01PM +0200, Cl=E9ment P=E9ron wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I'm missing ACK from ASoC Maintainers patch 2-3-4. >=20 > It's really small paches, if you could have a look at it. Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so=20 on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled. --aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl0s1kEACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Cw6Af+Lg1FCdunvHuQWgM9lkfW1yDRebhjo8R5qhgUtQE295gHjgjdqQ8xh6eM ZK1py52Bhvt7DJsJFZfrEBSzhkvLbYMENjj17tSpW3A6H7wHzkyGUOKq3FRIzG6m WciJzBWDsDtHEO6OUcrPDjvDJWOPeF8h2O+TOgsqOAGMDUPYG3l1iBozqVsFhwGA b79wc9pIIKvVsp71cE9ZF/m9Y9JTsIyf6Omq4m0zx7KD7nEP0oqnmtg+8AI+lkrC VEvioUOv9swbYdTsuPP+lwPqI/Wun1n4XDmppLD81iaZn8oHhW0FlU35PjoPRgGK oPWiRnOfQWTiKTZ5PFdwsicKK9ZQYg== =tPgX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1--