linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dbueso@suse.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, jstancek@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/rwsem: add acquire barrier to read_slowpath exit when queue is empty
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 21:22:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190717192200.GA17687@dustball.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21ff5905-198b-6ea5-6c2a-9fb10cb48ea7@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:19:04AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> If you add a comment to the code outlining the issue (preferably as a litmus
>> test involving sem->count and some shared data which happens to be
>> vmacache_seqnum in your test)), then:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Will
>
>Agreed. A comment just above smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep() on why this
>is needed will be great.
>
>Other than that,
>
>Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
>

litmus test looks a bit long, would following be acceptable?

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index 37524a47f002..d9c96651bfc7 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -1032,6 +1032,13 @@ static inline bool rwsem_reader_phase_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
  		 */
  		if (adjustment && !(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) &
  		     (RWSEM_WRITER_MASK | RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF))) {
+			/*
+			 * down_read() issued ACQUIRE on enter, but we can race
+			 * with writer who did RELEASE only after us.
+			 * ACQUIRE here makes sure reader operations happen only
+			 * after all writer ones.
+			 */
+			smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
  			raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
  			rwsem_set_reader_owned(sem);
  			lockevent_inc(rwsem_rlock_fast);


with litmus test in commit log:
----------------------------------- 8< ------------------------------------
C rwsem

{
	atomic_t rwsem_count = ATOMIC_INIT(1);
	int vmacache_seqnum = 10;
}

P0(int *vmacache_seqnum, atomic_t *rwsem_count)
{
	r0 = READ_ONCE(*vmacache_seqnum);
	WRITE_ONCE(*vmacache_seqnum, r0 + 1);
	/* downgrade_write */
	r1 = atomic_fetch_add_release(-1+256, rwsem_count);
}

P1(int *vmacache_seqnum, atomic_t *rwsem_count, spinlock_t *sem_wait_lock)
{
	/* rwsem_read_trylock */
	r0 = atomic_add_return_acquire(256, rwsem_count);
	/* rwsem_down_read_slowpath */
	spin_lock(sem_wait_lock);
	r0 = atomic_read(rwsem_count);
	if ((r0 & 1) == 0) {
		// BUG: needs barrier
		spin_unlock(sem_wait_lock);
		r1 = READ_ONCE(*vmacache_seqnum);
	}
}
exists (1:r1=10)
----------------------------------- 8< ------------------------------------

Thanks,
Jan


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-17 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-16 16:04 [PATCH] locking/rwsem: use read_acquire in read_slowpath exit when queue is empty Jan Stancek
2019-07-16 16:53 ` Waiman Long
2019-07-16 18:34   ` Jan Stancek
2019-07-16 18:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-16 19:09     ` Waiman Long
2019-07-17 12:02     ` [PATCH v2] locking/rwsem: add acquire barrier to " Jan Stancek
2019-07-17 13:13       ` Will Deacon
2019-07-17 14:19         ` Waiman Long
2019-07-17 19:22           ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2019-07-17 19:39             ` Waiman Long
2019-07-18  8:51               ` [PATCH v3] " Jan Stancek
2019-07-25 16:00                 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/rwsem: Add missing ACQUIRE " tip-bot for Jan Stancek
2019-07-18  9:26             ` [PATCH v2] locking/rwsem: add acquire barrier " Will Deacon
2019-07-18 10:50               ` Jan Stancek
2019-07-18 11:04                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-18 11:09                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-18 11:36                     ` Jan Stancek
2019-07-18 12:12                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-07-18 10:58               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-18 11:45                 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-18 12:23                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-17 15:33       ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190717192200.GA17687@dustball.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=dbueso@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).