linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org>, Matt Hart <matthew.hart@linaro.org>,
	Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Diaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: debug: Remove rcu_read_lock from debug exception
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 23:22:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190718062215.GG14271@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <156342863822.8565.7624877983728871995.stgit@devnote2>

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 02:43:58PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Remove rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() from debug exception
> handlers since the software breakpoint can be hit on idle task.

The exception entry and exit use irq_enter() and irq_exit(), in this
case, correct?  Otherwise RCU will be ignoring this CPU.

							Thanx, Paul

> Actually, we don't need it because those handlers run in exception
> context where the interrupts are disabled. This means those are never
> preempted.
> 
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c |   14 ++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> index f8719bd30850..48222a4760c2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> @@ -207,16 +207,16 @@ static int call_step_hook(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
>  
>  	list = user_mode(regs) ? &user_step_hook : &kernel_step_hook;
>  
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> -
> +	/*
> +	 * Since single-step exception disables interrupt, this function is
> +	 * entirely not preemptible, and we can use rcu list safely here.
> +	 */
>  	list_for_each_entry_rcu(hook, list, node)	{
>  		retval = hook->fn(regs, esr);
>  		if (retval == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
>  			break;
>  	}
>  
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> -
>  	return retval;
>  }
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(call_step_hook);
> @@ -305,14 +305,16 @@ static int call_break_hook(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
>  
>  	list = user_mode(regs) ? &user_break_hook : &kernel_break_hook;
>  
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> +	/*
> +	 * Since brk exception disables interrupt, this function is
> +	 * entirely not preemptible, and we can use rcu list safely here.
> +	 */
>  	list_for_each_entry_rcu(hook, list, node) {
>  		unsigned int comment = esr & ESR_ELx_BRK64_ISS_COMMENT_MASK;
>  
>  		if ((comment & ~hook->mask) == hook->imm)
>  			fn = hook->fn;
>  	}
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
>  
>  	return fn ? fn(regs, esr) : DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
>  }
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-18  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-18  5:43 [PATCH 0/3] arm64: kprobes: Fix some bugs in arm64 kprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2019-07-18  5:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: kprobes: Recover pstate.D in single-step exception handler Masami Hiramatsu
2019-07-19 10:07   ` James Morse
2019-07-20  6:22     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-07-18  5:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: unwind: Prohibit probing on return_address() Masami Hiramatsu
2019-07-18  5:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: debug: Remove rcu_read_lock from debug exception Masami Hiramatsu
2019-07-18  6:22   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2019-07-18  9:20     ` Mark Rutland
2019-07-18 14:31       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-07-19  8:42         ` James Morse
2019-07-20  7:32           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-07-21  1:50             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-07-19  9:59         ` Mark Rutland
2019-07-20  7:54           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-07-24 10:45             ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190718062215.GG14271@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dan.rue@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.diaz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.hart@linaro.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).