linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] locking/lockdep: Reduce space occupied by stack traces
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:24:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190722182443.216015-4-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190722182443.216015-1-bvanassche@acm.org>

Although commit 669de8bda87b ("kernel/workqueue: Use dynamic lockdep keys
for workqueues") unregisters dynamic lockdep keys when a workqueue is
destroyed, a side effect of that commit is that all stack traces
associated with the lockdep key are leaked when a workqueue is destroyed.
Fix this by storing each unique stack trace once. Other changes in this
patch are:
- Use NULL instead of { .nr_entries = 0 } to represent 'no trace'.
- Store a pointer to a stack trace in struct lock_class and struct
  lock_list instead of storing 'nr_entries' and 'offset'.

This patch avoids that the following program triggers the "BUG:
MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!" complaint:

	#include <fcntl.h>
	#include <unistd.h>

	int main()
	{
		for (;;) {
			int fd = open("/dev/infiniband/rdma_cm", O_RDWR);
			close(fd);
		}
	}

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
 include/linux/lockdep.h            |   9 +-
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c           | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
 kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h |   2 +
 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index cdb3c2f06092..b8a835fd611b 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -66,10 +66,7 @@ struct lock_class_key {
 
 extern struct lock_class_key __lockdep_no_validate__;
 
-struct lock_trace {
-	unsigned int		nr_entries;
-	unsigned int		offset;
-};
+struct lock_trace;
 
 #define LOCKSTAT_POINTS		4
 
@@ -105,7 +102,7 @@ struct lock_class {
 	 * IRQ/softirq usage tracking bits:
 	 */
 	unsigned long			usage_mask;
-	struct lock_trace		usage_traces[XXX_LOCK_USAGE_STATES];
+	const struct lock_trace		*usage_traces[XXX_LOCK_USAGE_STATES];
 
 	/*
 	 * Generation counter, when doing certain classes of graph walking,
@@ -193,7 +190,7 @@ struct lock_list {
 	struct list_head		entry;
 	struct lock_class		*class;
 	struct lock_class		*links_to;
-	struct lock_trace		trace;
+	const struct lock_trace		*trace;
 	int				distance;
 
 	/*
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index f4127c5a495d..19eace34b5fa 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -449,33 +449,72 @@ static void print_lockdep_off(const char *bug_msg)
 unsigned long nr_stack_trace_entries;
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)
+/**
+ * struct lock_trace - single stack backtrace
+ * @hash_entry:	Entry in a stack_trace_hash[] list.
+ * @hash:	jhash() of @entries.
+ * @nr_entries:	Number of entries in @entries.
+ * @entries:	Actual stack backtrace.
+ */
+struct lock_trace {
+	struct hlist_node	hash_entry;
+	u32			hash;
+	u32			nr_entries;
+	unsigned long		entries[0] __aligned(sizeof(unsigned long));
+};
+#define LOCK_TRACE_SIZE_IN_LONGS				\
+	(sizeof(struct lock_trace) / sizeof(unsigned long))
 /*
- * Stack-trace: tightly packed array of stack backtrace
- * addresses. Protected by the graph_lock.
+ * Stack-trace: sequence of lock_trace structures. Protected by the graph_lock.
  */
 static unsigned long stack_trace[MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES];
+static struct hlist_head stack_trace_hash[STACK_TRACE_HASH_SIZE];
+
+static bool traces_identical(struct lock_trace *t1, struct lock_trace *t2)
+{
+	return t1->hash == t2->hash && t1->nr_entries == t2->nr_entries &&
+		memcmp(t1->entries, t2->entries,
+		       t1->nr_entries * sizeof(t1->entries[0])) == 0;
+}
 
-static int save_trace(struct lock_trace *trace)
+static struct lock_trace *save_trace(void)
 {
-	unsigned long *entries = stack_trace + nr_stack_trace_entries;
+	struct lock_trace *trace, *t2;
+	struct hlist_head *hash_head;
+	u32 hash;
 	unsigned int max_entries;
 
-	trace->offset = nr_stack_trace_entries;
-	max_entries = MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES - nr_stack_trace_entries;
-	trace->nr_entries = stack_trace_save(entries, max_entries, 3);
-	nr_stack_trace_entries += trace->nr_entries;
+	BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(STACK_TRACE_HASH_SIZE);
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(LOCK_TRACE_SIZE_IN_LONGS >= MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES);
+
+	trace = (struct lock_trace *)(stack_trace + nr_stack_trace_entries);
+	max_entries = MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES - nr_stack_trace_entries -
+		LOCK_TRACE_SIZE_IN_LONGS;
+	trace->nr_entries = stack_trace_save(trace->entries, max_entries, 3);
 
-	if (nr_stack_trace_entries >= MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES-1) {
+	if (nr_stack_trace_entries >= MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES -
+	    LOCK_TRACE_SIZE_IN_LONGS - 1) {
 		if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
-			return 0;
+			return NULL;
 
 		print_lockdep_off("BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!");
 		dump_stack();
 
-		return 0;
+		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	return 1;
+	hash = jhash(trace->entries, trace->nr_entries *
+		     sizeof(trace->entries[0]), 0);
+	trace->hash = hash;
+	hash_head = stack_trace_hash + (hash & (STACK_TRACE_HASH_SIZE - 1));
+	hlist_for_each_entry(t2, hash_head, hash_entry) {
+		if (traces_identical(trace, t2))
+			return t2;
+	}
+	nr_stack_trace_entries += LOCK_TRACE_SIZE_IN_LONGS + trace->nr_entries;
+	hlist_add_head(&trace->hash_entry, hash_head);
+
+	return trace;
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -1235,7 +1274,7 @@ static struct lock_list *alloc_list_entry(void)
 static int add_lock_to_list(struct lock_class *this,
 			    struct lock_class *links_to, struct list_head *head,
 			    unsigned long ip, int distance,
-			    struct lock_trace *trace)
+			    const struct lock_trace *trace)
 {
 	struct lock_list *entry;
 	/*
@@ -1249,7 +1288,7 @@ static int add_lock_to_list(struct lock_class *this,
 	entry->class = this;
 	entry->links_to = links_to;
 	entry->distance = distance;
-	entry->trace = *trace;
+	entry->trace = trace;
 	/*
 	 * Both allocation and removal are done under the graph lock; but
 	 * iteration is under RCU-sched; see look_up_lock_class() and
@@ -1470,11 +1509,10 @@ static inline int __bfs_backwards(struct lock_list *src_entry,
 
 }
 
-static void print_lock_trace(struct lock_trace *trace, unsigned int spaces)
+static void print_lock_trace(const struct lock_trace *trace,
+			     unsigned int spaces)
 {
-	unsigned long *entries = stack_trace + trace->offset;
-
-	stack_trace_print(entries, trace->nr_entries, spaces);
+	stack_trace_print(trace->entries, trace->nr_entries, spaces);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1489,7 +1527,7 @@ print_circular_bug_entry(struct lock_list *target, int depth)
 	printk("\n-> #%u", depth);
 	print_lock_name(target->class);
 	printk(KERN_CONT ":\n");
-	print_lock_trace(&target->trace, 6);
+	print_lock_trace(target->trace, 6);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -1592,7 +1630,8 @@ static noinline void print_circular_bug(struct lock_list *this,
 	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
 		return;
 
-	if (!save_trace(&this->trace))
+	this->trace = save_trace();
+	if (!this->trace)
 		return;
 
 	depth = get_lock_depth(target);
@@ -1715,7 +1754,7 @@ check_path(struct lock_class *target, struct lock_list *src_entry,
  */
 static noinline int
 check_noncircular(struct held_lock *src, struct held_lock *target,
-		  struct lock_trace *trace)
+		  struct lock_trace **const trace)
 {
 	int ret;
 	struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);
@@ -1729,13 +1768,13 @@ check_noncircular(struct held_lock *src, struct held_lock *target,
 	ret = check_path(hlock_class(target), &src_entry, &target_entry);
 
 	if (unlikely(!ret)) {
-		if (!trace->nr_entries) {
+		if (!*trace) {
 			/*
 			 * If save_trace fails here, the printing might
 			 * trigger a WARN but because of the !nr_entries it
 			 * should not do bad things.
 			 */
-			save_trace(trace);
+			*trace = save_trace();
 		}
 
 		print_circular_bug(&src_entry, target_entry, src, target);
@@ -1859,7 +1898,7 @@ static void print_lock_class_header(struct lock_class *class, int depth)
 
 			len += printk("%*s   %s", depth, "", usage_str[bit]);
 			len += printk(KERN_CONT " at:\n");
-			print_lock_trace(class->usage_traces + bit, len);
+			print_lock_trace(class->usage_traces[bit], len);
 		}
 	}
 	printk("%*s }\n", depth, "");
@@ -1884,7 +1923,7 @@ print_shortest_lock_dependencies(struct lock_list *leaf,
 	do {
 		print_lock_class_header(entry->class, depth);
 		printk("%*s ... acquired at:\n", depth, "");
-		print_lock_trace(&entry->trace, 2);
+		print_lock_trace(entry->trace, 2);
 		printk("\n");
 
 		if (depth == 0 && (entry != root)) {
@@ -1995,14 +2034,14 @@ print_bad_irq_dependency(struct task_struct *curr,
 	print_lock_name(backwards_entry->class);
 	pr_warn("\n... which became %s-irq-safe at:\n", irqclass);
 
-	print_lock_trace(backwards_entry->class->usage_traces + bit1, 1);
+	print_lock_trace(backwards_entry->class->usage_traces[bit1], 1);
 
 	pr_warn("\nto a %s-irq-unsafe lock:\n", irqclass);
 	print_lock_name(forwards_entry->class);
 	pr_warn("\n... which became %s-irq-unsafe at:\n", irqclass);
 	pr_warn("...");
 
-	print_lock_trace(forwards_entry->class->usage_traces + bit2, 1);
+	print_lock_trace(forwards_entry->class->usage_traces[bit2], 1);
 
 	pr_warn("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n");
 	print_irq_lock_scenario(backwards_entry, forwards_entry,
@@ -2011,13 +2050,15 @@ print_bad_irq_dependency(struct task_struct *curr,
 	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
 
 	pr_warn("\nthe dependencies between %s-irq-safe lock and the holding lock:\n", irqclass);
-	if (!save_trace(&prev_root->trace))
+	prev_root->trace = save_trace();
+	if (!prev_root->trace)
 		return;
 	print_shortest_lock_dependencies(backwards_entry, prev_root);
 
 	pr_warn("\nthe dependencies between the lock to be acquired");
 	pr_warn(" and %s-irq-unsafe lock:\n", irqclass);
-	if (!save_trace(&next_root->trace))
+	next_root->trace = save_trace();
+	if (!next_root->trace)
 		return;
 	print_shortest_lock_dependencies(forwards_entry, next_root);
 
@@ -2369,7 +2410,8 @@ check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
  */
 static int
 check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
-	       struct held_lock *next, int distance, struct lock_trace *trace)
+	       struct held_lock *next, int distance,
+	       struct lock_trace **const trace)
 {
 	struct lock_list *entry;
 	int ret;
@@ -2444,8 +2486,11 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
 		return ret;
 #endif
 
-	if (!trace->nr_entries && !save_trace(trace))
-		return 0;
+	if (!*trace) {
+		*trace = save_trace();
+		if (!*trace)
+			return 0;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Ok, all validations passed, add the new lock
@@ -2453,14 +2498,14 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
 	 */
 	ret = add_lock_to_list(hlock_class(next), hlock_class(prev),
 			       &hlock_class(prev)->locks_after,
-			       next->acquire_ip, distance, trace);
+			       next->acquire_ip, distance, *trace);
 
 	if (!ret)
 		return 0;
 
 	ret = add_lock_to_list(hlock_class(prev), hlock_class(next),
 			       &hlock_class(next)->locks_before,
-			       next->acquire_ip, distance, trace);
+			       next->acquire_ip, distance, *trace);
 	if (!ret)
 		return 0;
 
@@ -2476,7 +2521,7 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
 static int
 check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
 {
-	struct lock_trace trace = { .nr_entries = 0 };
+	struct lock_trace *trace = NULL;
 	int depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
 	struct held_lock *hlock;
 
@@ -3015,7 +3060,7 @@ print_usage_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
 	print_lock(this);
 
 	pr_warn("{%s} state was registered at:\n", usage_str[prev_bit]);
-	print_lock_trace(hlock_class(this)->usage_traces + prev_bit, 1);
+	print_lock_trace(hlock_class(this)->usage_traces[prev_bit], 1);
 
 	print_irqtrace_events(curr);
 	pr_warn("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n");
@@ -3096,7 +3141,8 @@ print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_struct *curr,
 	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
 
 	pr_warn("\nthe shortest dependencies between 2nd lock and 1st lock:\n");
-	if (!save_trace(&root->trace))
+	root->trace = save_trace();
+	if (!root->trace)
 		return;
 	print_shortest_lock_dependencies(other, root);
 
@@ -3580,7 +3626,7 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
 
 	hlock_class(this)->usage_mask |= new_mask;
 
-	if (!save_trace(hlock_class(this)->usage_traces + new_bit))
+	if (!(hlock_class(this)->usage_traces[new_bit] = save_trace()))
 		return 0;
 
 	switch (new_bit) {
@@ -5158,6 +5204,12 @@ void __init lockdep_init(void)
 		) / 1024
 		);
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)
+	printk(" memory used for stack traces: %zu kB\n",
+	       (sizeof(stack_trace) + sizeof(stack_trace_hash)) / 1024
+	       );
+#endif
+
 	printk(" per task-struct memory footprint: %zu bytes\n",
 	       sizeof(((struct task_struct *)NULL)->held_locks));
 }
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h
index 2e518369add4..93a008bf77db 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ static const unsigned long LOCKF_USED_IN_IRQ_READ =
 #define MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES	16384UL
 #define MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS	15
 #define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES	262144UL
+#define STACK_TRACE_HASH_SIZE	8192
 #else
 #define MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES	32768UL
 
@@ -102,6 +103,7 @@ static const unsigned long LOCKF_USED_IN_IRQ_READ =
  * addresses. Protected by the hash_lock.
  */
 #define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES	524288UL
+#define STACK_TRACE_HASH_SIZE	16384
 #endif
 
 #define MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS	(1UL << MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS)
-- 
2.22.0.657.g960e92d24f-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-22 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-22 18:24 [PATCH 0/4] Lockdep: Reduce stack trace memory usage Bart Van Assche
2019-07-22 18:24 ` [PATCH 1/4] locking/lockdep: Make it clear that what lock_class::key points at is not modified Bart Van Assche
2019-07-25 16:08   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-07-22 18:24 ` [PATCH 2/4] stacktrace: Constify 'entries' arguments Bart Van Assche
2019-07-25 16:09   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-07-22 18:24 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2019-07-24  4:56   ` [PATCH 3/4] locking/lockdep: Reduce space occupied by stack traces Eric Biggers
2019-07-24 15:47     ` Bart Van Assche
2019-07-25 16:10   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-07-22 18:24 ` [PATCH 4/4] locking/lockdep: Report more stack trace statistics Bart Van Assche
2019-07-25 16:10   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Bart Van Assche
2019-07-23  9:27 ` [PATCH 0/4] Lockdep: Reduce stack trace memory usage Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190722182443.216015-4-bvanassche@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=duyuyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).