From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E129CC7618B for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 14:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95FF21842 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 14:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="aukX6NjY" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388355AbfGWOwL (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 10:52:11 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:43708 "EHLO mail-wr1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729058AbfGWOwL (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 10:52:11 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id p13so43484972wru.10; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:52:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=kYSaq/H0a1K5O6GgVQzeldJnwoS+ik7bLUeJy2mAJ1A=; b=aukX6NjY5vGXcUMBB7dCljUvzTQzh3KCQ2SsVn4v4prgUDICht9MtYvmKH0taCJILB Qx7krhdvRr84zDCfJ0YoBYkHbyFxT9T7R+0390Ib53rvGYIVdAoU4ukd6T54zwDgFhXf kURlWc2HSpFdNz0eW+lDZ5c+PqgGo8CKmHpO5GL4TZGiyTql3rylP4hDxUWcObDdeeao /AG6a+NawBkABpAV71zqHa4SErX4S9AzbJWlObwK+3R4P3vn/p2zMIgDwHzdwi5tR2JY MCX3OIjhTDn5/sMtwm3fmWWZEu6J1nNF2JpNROAUXgRDGtxt789Kmc2H4lZTbCDqIf+E teIg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=kYSaq/H0a1K5O6GgVQzeldJnwoS+ik7bLUeJy2mAJ1A=; b=Ke+/BGvX+a+5W1Cd+PLjbvdoSP8DLclhYo+Zwc1aytp0EaiSbkt2Gp5yXf+CBeFyAs y/RUFv0d/hr44TIFD6clc6wn4rAqUn8m1PGpPSCDAfbRv2AIUumkAlYZM3il8gr2y9qb IqLoWbHuviv9DBXpwiAaAxNTXvM92Ua0iZsu2DFKHeNSMgSYogPQlkax4V0Zdc8URWT3 zCWwL0GNoPZ5PPlCtXawUnJlU9a2ecP/QZLPf2UfxtBfYNvKOGZfGssQ4D+b4wKHZ5pV DFWJNtqazxeOTUdhysRpr0vdCcecKsmvdz5NUEz3cLKMy34WrYH7qqL/vLkuRvScFQJr Veow== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXHGrgD+vsIIS6Np8cHRrzj2zUu5DbDl0oU1ii9o9j3ZIs2jF9+ ilfEXgVWJoLEv4j2BWAg7VvIZuGLYwQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwq0DLfDr/GEx8Ioo9rXYOVzEw+HqTLlypdVOTwN/scxJ1hlwnITW1gc8tynJDxNVNwzem68Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4090:: with SMTP id o16mr7929232wrp.292.1563893529374; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:52:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([197.211.57.129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c78sm62424451wmd.16.2019.07.23.07.52.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:52:01 +0100 From: Sheriff Esseson To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , "supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM" , Jonathan Corbet , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , open list , skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: filesystem: fix "Removed Sysctls" table Message-ID: <20190723145201.GA20658@localhost> References: <20190723114813.GA14870@localhost> <20190723074218.4532737f@lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190723074218.4532737f@lwn.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:42:18AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:48:13 +0100 > Sheriff Esseson wrote: > > > the "Removed Sysctls" section is a table - bring it alive with ReST. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sheriff Esseson > > So this appears to be identical to the patch you sent three days ago; is > there a reason why you are sending it again now? > > Thanks, > > jon Sorry, I was think the patch went unnoticed during the merge window - I could not find a response.