From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F95C76186 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:23:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F372239F for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:23:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732760AbfGWQXn (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:23:43 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:43111 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727195AbfGWQXl (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:23:41 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id DA76168B02; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 18:23:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 18:23:38 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , Ben Skeggs , Ralph Campbell , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org" , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] nouveau: remove the block parameter to nouveau_range_fault Message-ID: <20190723162338.GC1655@lst.de> References: <20190722094426.18563-1-hch@lst.de> <20190722094426.18563-4-hch@lst.de> <20190723145620.GK15331@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190723145620.GK15331@mellanox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 02:56:24PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:44:23AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The parameter is always false, so remove it as well as the -EAGAIN > > handling that can only happen for the non-blocking case. > > ? Did the EAGAIN handling get removed in this patch? No. The next revision will remove it.