From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: fweisbec@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: How to turn scheduler tick on for current nohz_full CPU?
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 04:53:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190724115331.GA29059@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Hello!
One of the callback-invocation forward-progress issues turns out to
be nohz_full CPUs not turning their scheduling-clock interrupt back on
when running in kernel mode. Given that callback floods can cause RCU's
callback-invocation loop to run for some time, it would be good for this
loop to re-enable this interrupt. Of course, this problem applies to
pretty much any kernel code that might loop for an extended time period,
not just RCU.
I took a quick look at kernel/time/tick-sched.c and the closest thing
I found was tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(), except that (1) it isn't clear
that this does much when invoked on the current CPU and (2) it doesn't
help in rcutorture TREE04. In contrast, disabling NO_HZ_FULL and using
RCU_NOCB_CPU instead works quite well.
So what should I be calling instead of tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu() to
re-enable the current CPU's scheduling-clock interrupt?
Thanx, Paul
next reply other threads:[~2019-07-24 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-24 11:53 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2019-07-24 13:22 ` How to turn scheduler tick on for current nohz_full CPU? Frederic Weisbecker
2019-07-24 13:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-07-24 14:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-07-25 1:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-07-29 22:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-07-30 16:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-07-30 17:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-19 2:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190724115331.GA29059@linux.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).