From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4EFDC7618B for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59F4229F3 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:57:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1563983860; bh=WmChL+Yyy9MFTNkMH2DU83voQKBjFaMJYXMpkoWGQZM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=uxxTFDTaXLcXIXaKPVg2pPDV1s1w7ST/TmDcN4+Rs5qKQMz9CR293ALdUkFXSH5cg SEosbY4YBhvyJDqWGn9K8MjDMxCyyKpQoyrcK6hSUhIhZBU++H9mEHwnMiWhzX0iu+ 8ND/TTmZik6gAfC2ouarT4/4EzHFBRj3kf7I7cgY= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728209AbfGXP5j (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:57:39 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58774 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725776AbfGXP5j (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:57:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D5C62083B; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:57:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1563983858; bh=WmChL+Yyy9MFTNkMH2DU83voQKBjFaMJYXMpkoWGQZM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HYAOOvPlDrCRaetUlG5ur3qrKVKQ3OB91rXLMuAMkAZh/HBEECZKXOTUSMqkRM4fz 71Kh3BFX7/C0fHjoGkxWGncYHPtLn2mkpey16PmoMeLMtTuUmqtsAGWtyEXEe1aEnD n0LnJbcRlTyppcxLVdwWgrOoYN+bb8WDthBISXgk= Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:57:35 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "H.J. Lu" , Mike Lothian , Tom Lendacky , bhe@redhat.com, Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , lijiang@redhat.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , the arch/x86 maintainers Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/mm: Identify the end of the kernel area to be reserved Message-ID: <20190724155735.GC5571@kroah.com> References: <20190723130513.GA25290@kroah.com> <20190723134454.GA7260@kroah.com> <20190724153416.GA27117@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 05:49:45PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:44:54PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > Sorry, I saw that after writing that. You are right, if the others > > > don't object, that's fine with me. I'll go poke the various build > > > systems that are failing right now on 5.3-rc1 and try to get them fixed > > > for this reason. > > > > Ok, I dug around and the gold linker is not being used here, only clang > > to build the source and GNU ld to link, and I am still seeing this > > error. > > Odd combo. I'm not disagreeing :) Wait, does clang link things itself and not need ld? > > Hm, clang 8 does not cause this error, but clang 9 does. Let me go poke > > the people who are providing this version of clang to see if there's > > something they can figure out. > > Let me try that with my clang variant. Which version of GNU ld are you > using? I think it is 2.27: $ ./ld --version GNU ld (binutils-2.27-44492f8) 2.27.0.20170315 Which does feel old to me. I know 2.32 works fine. Gotta love old tool-chains :( greg k-h