From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB50C7618B for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB8A22387 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:16:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1563985000; bh=a24TsQt9JYma1IzUe2EluXMiNaz5l9qhJR7tK9JqkyE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=U3Vg+olrXVvglq0NvlFAM1Uysp06Lf5h3QkLMfHjwh2GbKTODs0Lrvk6PQrh28D7R Nz3Kvppoj1wDRiew0U7OLcOfe68q5eQGDJlC3d0/XJ20x18q6GQj8DkQ8ds12w/X7V 1Ud34RvvqEv9v697KHj6kL4Dx7Jc5+szOUZjNED0= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728676AbfGXQQi (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:16:38 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41008 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728648AbfGXQQh (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:16:37 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C016921841; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:16:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1563984996; bh=a24TsQt9JYma1IzUe2EluXMiNaz5l9qhJR7tK9JqkyE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ajdUxVrlg8zUkV1c0GL7ldAD9peSRe8hChjlirVOBa7Elqm0xgGGfZbUPM/P9x6hF X/JZuzdJyeylxOF0stS2H2BfDWcboECtPBnLmxJE0KCmMU5ZYCWPP+FIIH1gIZH64N OTf7LkHOvGkbUYP/y9dLa1TIrF/IgQ7ZTpIIms3A= Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 18:16:34 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "H.J. Lu" , Mike Lothian , Tom Lendacky , bhe@redhat.com, Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , lijiang@redhat.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , the arch/x86 maintainers Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/mm: Identify the end of the kernel area to be reserved Message-ID: <20190724161634.GB10454@kroah.com> References: <20190723130513.GA25290@kroah.com> <20190723134454.GA7260@kroah.com> <20190724153416.GA27117@kroah.com> <20190724155735.GC5571@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 06:03:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 05:49:45PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > Ok, I dug around and the gold linker is not being used here, only clang > > > > to build the source and GNU ld to link, and I am still seeing this > > > > error. > > > > > > Odd combo. > > > > I'm not disagreeing :) > > > > Wait, does clang link things itself and not need ld? > > Nah. > > > > > Hm, clang 8 does not cause this error, but clang 9 does. Let me go poke > > > > the people who are providing this version of clang to see if there's > > > > something they can figure out. > > > > > > Let me try that with my clang variant. Which version of GNU ld are you > > > using? > > > > I think it is 2.27: > > $ ./ld --version > > GNU ld (binutils-2.27-44492f8) 2.27.0.20170315 > > > > Which does feel old to me. > > > > I know 2.32 works fine. > > 2.31 works fine as well. > > > Gotta love old tool-chains :( > > Oh yes. /me does archaeology to find a VM with old stuff I can provide a binary if you can't find anything. thanks, greg k-h