linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH stable-4.19 0/2] KVM: nVMX: guest reset fixes
@ 2019-07-25 10:46 Vitaly Kuznetsov
  2019-07-25 10:46 ` [PATCH stable-4.19 1/2] KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset Vitaly Kuznetsov
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov @ 2019-07-25 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable; +Cc: kvm, linux-kernel, Paolo Bonzini, Radim Krčmář

Few patches were recently marked for stable@ but commits are not
backportable as-is and require a few tweaks. Here is 4.19 stable backport.

Jan Kiszka (1):
  KVM: nVMX: Clear pending KVM_REQ_GET_VMCS12_PAGES when leaving nested

Paolo Bonzini (1):
  KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset

 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH stable-4.19 1/2] KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset
  2019-07-25 10:46 [PATCH stable-4.19 0/2] KVM: nVMX: guest reset fixes Vitaly Kuznetsov
@ 2019-07-25 10:46 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
  2019-07-29  8:58   ` Jack Wang
  2019-07-25 10:46 ` [PATCH stable-4.19 2/2] KVM: nVMX: Clear pending KVM_REQ_GET_VMCS12_PAGES when leaving nested Vitaly Kuznetsov
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov @ 2019-07-25 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable; +Cc: kvm, linux-kernel, Paolo Bonzini, Radim Krčmář

From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 88dddc11a8d6b09201b4db9d255b3394d9bc9e57 ]

If a KVM guest is reset while running a nested guest, free_nested will
disable the shadow VMCS execution control in the vmcs01.  However,
on the next KVM_RUN vmx_vcpu_run would nevertheless try to sync
the VMCS12 to the shadow VMCS which has since been freed.

This causes a vmptrld of a NULL pointer on my machime, but Jan reports
the host to hang altogether.  Let's see how much this trivial patch fixes.

Reported-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 73d6d585dd66..880bc36a0d5d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -8457,6 +8457,7 @@ static void vmx_disable_shadow_vmcs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 {
 	vmcs_clear_bits(SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, SECONDARY_EXEC_SHADOW_VMCS);
 	vmcs_write64(VMCS_LINK_POINTER, -1ull);
+	vmx->nested.sync_shadow_vmcs = false;
 }
 
 static inline void nested_release_vmcs12(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
@@ -8468,7 +8469,6 @@ static inline void nested_release_vmcs12(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 		/* copy to memory all shadowed fields in case
 		   they were modified */
 		copy_shadow_to_vmcs12(vmx);
-		vmx->nested.sync_shadow_vmcs = false;
 		vmx_disable_shadow_vmcs(vmx);
 	}
 	vmx->nested.posted_intr_nv = -1;
@@ -8668,6 +8668,9 @@ static void copy_shadow_to_vmcs12(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 	u64 field_value;
 	struct vmcs *shadow_vmcs = vmx->vmcs01.shadow_vmcs;
 
+	if (WARN_ON(!shadow_vmcs))
+		return;
+
 	preempt_disable();
 
 	vmcs_load(shadow_vmcs);
@@ -8706,6 +8709,9 @@ static void copy_vmcs12_to_shadow(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 	u64 field_value = 0;
 	struct vmcs *shadow_vmcs = vmx->vmcs01.shadow_vmcs;
 
+	if (WARN_ON(!shadow_vmcs))
+		return;
+
 	vmcs_load(shadow_vmcs);
 
 	for (q = 0; q < ARRAY_SIZE(fields); q++) {
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH stable-4.19 2/2] KVM: nVMX: Clear pending KVM_REQ_GET_VMCS12_PAGES when leaving nested
  2019-07-25 10:46 [PATCH stable-4.19 0/2] KVM: nVMX: guest reset fixes Vitaly Kuznetsov
  2019-07-25 10:46 ` [PATCH stable-4.19 1/2] KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset Vitaly Kuznetsov
@ 2019-07-25 10:46 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
  2019-07-25 11:24 ` [PATCH stable-4.19 0/2] KVM: nVMX: guest reset fixes Paolo Bonzini
  2019-07-26 13:48 ` Greg KH
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov @ 2019-07-25 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable; +Cc: kvm, linux-kernel, Paolo Bonzini, Radim Krčmář

From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>

[ Upstream commit cf64527bb33f6cec2ed50f89182fc4688d0056b6 ]

Letting this pend may cause nested_get_vmcs12_pages to run against an
invalid state, corrupting the effective vmcs of L1.

This was triggerable in QEMU after a guest corruption in L2, followed by
a L1 reset.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 7f7f1ba33cf2 ("KVM: x86: do not load vmcs12 pages while still in SMM")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 880bc36a0d5d..4cf16378dffe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -8490,6 +8490,8 @@ static void free_nested(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 	if (!vmx->nested.vmxon && !vmx->nested.smm.vmxon)
 		return;
 
+	kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_GET_VMCS12_PAGES, &vmx->vcpu);
+
 	hrtimer_cancel(&vmx->nested.preemption_timer);
 	vmx->nested.vmxon = false;
 	vmx->nested.smm.vmxon = false;
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH stable-4.19 0/2] KVM: nVMX: guest reset fixes
  2019-07-25 10:46 [PATCH stable-4.19 0/2] KVM: nVMX: guest reset fixes Vitaly Kuznetsov
  2019-07-25 10:46 ` [PATCH stable-4.19 1/2] KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset Vitaly Kuznetsov
  2019-07-25 10:46 ` [PATCH stable-4.19 2/2] KVM: nVMX: Clear pending KVM_REQ_GET_VMCS12_PAGES when leaving nested Vitaly Kuznetsov
@ 2019-07-25 11:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
  2019-07-26 13:48 ` Greg KH
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2019-07-25 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vitaly Kuznetsov, stable; +Cc: kvm, linux-kernel, Radim Krčmář

On 25/07/19 12:46, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Few patches were recently marked for stable@ but commits are not
> backportable as-is and require a few tweaks. Here is 4.19 stable backport.
> 
> Jan Kiszka (1):
>   KVM: nVMX: Clear pending KVM_REQ_GET_VMCS12_PAGES when leaving nested
> 
> Paolo Bonzini (1):
>   KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset
> 
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Thanks Vitaly for helping out.

Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH stable-4.19 0/2] KVM: nVMX: guest reset fixes
  2019-07-25 10:46 [PATCH stable-4.19 0/2] KVM: nVMX: guest reset fixes Vitaly Kuznetsov
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-07-25 11:24 ` [PATCH stable-4.19 0/2] KVM: nVMX: guest reset fixes Paolo Bonzini
@ 2019-07-26 13:48 ` Greg KH
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2019-07-26 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vitaly Kuznetsov
  Cc: stable, kvm, linux-kernel, Paolo Bonzini, Radim Krčmář

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:46:43PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Few patches were recently marked for stable@ but commits are not
> backportable as-is and require a few tweaks. Here is 4.19 stable backport.
> 
> Jan Kiszka (1):
>   KVM: nVMX: Clear pending KVM_REQ_GET_VMCS12_PAGES when leaving nested
> 
> Paolo Bonzini (1):
>   KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset
> 
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

All now applied, thanks!

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH stable-4.19 1/2] KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset
  2019-07-25 10:46 ` [PATCH stable-4.19 1/2] KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset Vitaly Kuznetsov
@ 2019-07-29  8:58   ` Jack Wang
  2019-07-29  9:10     ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jack Wang @ 2019-07-29  8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vitaly Kuznetsov
  Cc: stable, kvm, linux-kernel, Paolo Bonzini, Radim Krčmář

Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> 于2019年7月25日周四 下午3:29写道:
>
> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 88dddc11a8d6b09201b4db9d255b3394d9bc9e57 ]
>
> If a KVM guest is reset while running a nested guest, free_nested will
> disable the shadow VMCS execution control in the vmcs01.  However,
> on the next KVM_RUN vmx_vcpu_run would nevertheless try to sync
> the VMCS12 to the shadow VMCS which has since been freed.
>
> This causes a vmptrld of a NULL pointer on my machime, but Jan reports
> the host to hang altogether.  Let's see how much this trivial patch fixes.
>
> Reported-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Hi all,

Do we need to backport the fix also to stable 4.14?  It applies
cleanly and compiles fine.

Regards,
Jack Wang

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH stable-4.19 1/2] KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset
  2019-07-29  8:58   ` Jack Wang
@ 2019-07-29  9:10     ` Paolo Bonzini
  2019-07-29  9:29       ` Jack Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2019-07-29  9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jack Wang, Vitaly Kuznetsov
  Cc: stable, kvm, linux-kernel, Radim Krčmář

On 29/07/19 10:58, Jack Wang wrote:
> Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> 于2019年7月25日周四 下午3:29写道:
>>
>> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 88dddc11a8d6b09201b4db9d255b3394d9bc9e57 ]
>>
>> If a KVM guest is reset while running a nested guest, free_nested will
>> disable the shadow VMCS execution control in the vmcs01.  However,
>> on the next KVM_RUN vmx_vcpu_run would nevertheless try to sync
>> the VMCS12 to the shadow VMCS which has since been freed.
>>
>> This causes a vmptrld of a NULL pointer on my machime, but Jan reports
>> the host to hang altogether.  Let's see how much this trivial patch fixes.
>>
>> Reported-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>> Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Do we need to backport the fix also to stable 4.14?  It applies
> cleanly and compiles fine.

The reproducer required newer kernels that support KVM_GET_NESTED_STATE
and KVM_SET_NESTED_STATE, so it would be hard to test it.  However, the
patch itself should be safe.

Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH stable-4.19 1/2] KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset
  2019-07-29  9:10     ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2019-07-29  9:29       ` Jack Wang
  2019-07-29  9:30         ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jack Wang @ 2019-07-29  9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini, Sasha Levin, Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov, stable, kvm, linux-kernel, Radim Krčmář

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> 于2019年7月29日周一 上午11:10写道:
>
> On 29/07/19 10:58, Jack Wang wrote:
> > Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> 于2019年7月25日周四 下午3:29写道:
> >>
> >> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> >>
> >> [ Upstream commit 88dddc11a8d6b09201b4db9d255b3394d9bc9e57 ]
> >>
> >> If a KVM guest is reset while running a nested guest, free_nested will
> >> disable the shadow VMCS execution control in the vmcs01.  However,
> >> on the next KVM_RUN vmx_vcpu_run would nevertheless try to sync
> >> the VMCS12 to the shadow VMCS which has since been freed.
> >>
> >> This causes a vmptrld of a NULL pointer on my machime, but Jan reports
> >> the host to hang altogether.  Let's see how much this trivial patch fixes.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> >> Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Do we need to backport the fix also to stable 4.14?  It applies
> > cleanly and compiles fine.
>
> The reproducer required newer kernels that support KVM_GET_NESTED_STATE
> and KVM_SET_NESTED_STATE, so it would be hard to test it.  However, the
> patch itself should be safe.
>
> Paolo

Thanks Paolo for confirmation. I'm asking because we had one incident
in our production with 4.14.129 kernel,
System is Skylake Gold cpu, first kvm errors, host hung afterwards

kernel: [1186161.091160] kvm: vmptrld           (null)/6bfc00000000 failed
kernel: [1186161.091537] kvm: vmclear fail:           (null)/6bfc00000000
kernel: [1186186.490300] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#54 stuck for
23s! [qemu:16639]

Hi Sasha, hi Greg,

Would be great if you can pick this patch also to 4.14 kernel.

Best regards,
Jack Wang

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH stable-4.19 1/2] KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset
  2019-07-29  9:29       ` Jack Wang
@ 2019-07-29  9:30         ` Paolo Bonzini
  2019-07-29 15:31           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2019-07-29  9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jack Wang, Sasha Levin, Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov, stable, kvm, linux-kernel, Radim Krčmář

On 29/07/19 11:29, Jack Wang wrote:
> Thanks Paolo for confirmation. I'm asking because we had one incident
> in our production with 4.14.129 kernel,
> System is Skylake Gold cpu, first kvm errors, host hung afterwards
> 
> kernel: [1186161.091160] kvm: vmptrld           (null)/6bfc00000000 failed
> kernel: [1186161.091537] kvm: vmclear fail:           (null)/6bfc00000000
> kernel: [1186186.490300] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#54 stuck for
> 23s! [qemu:16639]
> 
> Hi Sasha, hi Greg,
> 
> Would be great if you can pick this patch also to 4.14 kernel.

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH stable-4.19 1/2] KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset
  2019-07-29  9:30         ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2019-07-29 15:31           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2019-07-29 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini
  Cc: Jack Wang, Sasha Levin, Vitaly Kuznetsov, stable, kvm,
	linux-kernel, Radim Krčmář

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:30:19AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 29/07/19 11:29, Jack Wang wrote:
> > Thanks Paolo for confirmation. I'm asking because we had one incident
> > in our production with 4.14.129 kernel,
> > System is Skylake Gold cpu, first kvm errors, host hung afterwards
> > 
> > kernel: [1186161.091160] kvm: vmptrld           (null)/6bfc00000000 failed
> > kernel: [1186161.091537] kvm: vmclear fail:           (null)/6bfc00000000
> > kernel: [1186186.490300] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#54 stuck for
> > 23s! [qemu:16639]
> > 
> > Hi Sasha, hi Greg,
> > 
> > Would be great if you can pick this patch also to 4.14 kernel.
> 
> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Ok, now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-29 15:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-25 10:46 [PATCH stable-4.19 0/2] KVM: nVMX: guest reset fixes Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-07-25 10:46 ` [PATCH stable-4.19 1/2] KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-07-29  8:58   ` Jack Wang
2019-07-29  9:10     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-29  9:29       ` Jack Wang
2019-07-29  9:30         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-29 15:31           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-07-25 10:46 ` [PATCH stable-4.19 2/2] KVM: nVMX: Clear pending KVM_REQ_GET_VMCS12_PAGES when leaving nested Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-07-25 11:24 ` [PATCH stable-4.19 0/2] KVM: nVMX: guest reset fixes Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-26 13:48 ` Greg KH

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).