linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] printk: new ringbuffer implementation
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 03:33:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190727013333.11260-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de> (raw)

Hello,

This is a follow-up RFC on the work to re-implement much of
the core of printk. The threads for the previous RFC versions
are here: v1[0], v2[1].

As was planned[2], this is only the first piece: a new
lockless ringbuffer.

Changes from v2:

- Moved all code into kernel/printk/. Let's keep it private
  for now.

- Split the ringbuffer into 3 components:

  * a data ringbuffer (dataring) to manage the raw data and
    data descriptors

  * a numbered list (numlist) to manage committed entries and
    their sequence numbers

  * the printk_ringbuffer, which is the high-level structure
    providing the reader/writer API and glue for the other
    structures

  Splitting the components apart helped to document their
  roles and their related memory barriers (and will hopefully
  also simplify the review process).

- Renamed most functions, structures, and variables based on
  v2 feedback.

- Rewrote and reformatted nearly all comments (particularly
  the memory barrier comments) based on v2 feedback.

- Addressed implementation issues with v2:

  * invalid data blocks potentially becoming valid because of
    overflows

  * weak associations between data blocks and descriptors

  * excessive freeing of data blocks due to unavailable
    descriptors

- Improved error handling and data integrity checks in the test
  module.

For the memory barrier work I wrote a litmus test for nearly
every memory barrier. I did not include these in the series.
Should I? If yes, where should they be placed?

I would like to point out that Petr Mladek posted a
proof-of-concept[3] alternate implementation. I wanted to base my
v3 on his work, but ran into too many problems getting it to
run acceptably. I will address those issues in that thread. This
is why my v3 is based directly on my v2.

John Ogness

[0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190212143003.48446-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190607162349.18199-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de
[2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87y35hn6ih.fsf@linutronix.de
[3] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190704103321.10022-1-pmladek@suse.com

John Ogness (2):
  printk-rb: add a new printk ringbuffer implementation
  printk-rb: add test module

 kernel/printk/Makefile     |   5 +
 kernel/printk/dataring.c   | 761 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/printk/dataring.h   |  95 ++++++
 kernel/printk/numlist.c    | 375 +++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/printk/numlist.h    |  72 ++++
 kernel/printk/ringbuffer.c | 800 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/printk/ringbuffer.h | 288 ++++++++++++++++
 kernel/printk/test_prb.c   | 256 +++++++++++++++
 8 files changed, 2652 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 kernel/printk/dataring.c
 create mode 100644 kernel/printk/dataring.h
 create mode 100644 kernel/printk/numlist.c
 create mode 100644 kernel/printk/numlist.h
 create mode 100644 kernel/printk/ringbuffer.c
 create mode 100644 kernel/printk/ringbuffer.h
 create mode 100644 kernel/printk/test_prb.c

-- 
2.11.0


             reply	other threads:[~2019-07-27  1:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-27  1:33 John Ogness [this message]
2019-07-27  1:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] printk-rb: add a new printk ringbuffer implementation John Ogness
2019-07-27  1:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] printk-rb: add test module John Ogness
2019-07-31  6:46   ` John Ogness

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190727013333.11260-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).