linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: kmemleak: Use mempool allocations for kmemleak objects
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 08:41:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190801064153.GD11627@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190731154450.GB17773@arrakis.emea.arm.com>

On Wed 31-07-19 16:44:50, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 01:02:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 14:23:33 +0100 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Add mempool allocations for struct kmemleak_object and
> > > kmemleak_scan_area as slightly more resilient than kmem_cache_alloc()
> > > under memory pressure. Additionally, mask out all the gfp flags passed
> > > to kmemleak other than GFP_KERNEL|GFP_ATOMIC.
> > > 
> > > A boot-time tuning parameter (kmemleak.mempool) is added to allow a
> > > different minimum pool size (defaulting to NR_CPUS * 4).
> > 
> > btw, the checkpatch warnings are valid:
> > 
> > WARNING: usage of NR_CPUS is often wrong - consider using cpu_possible(), num_possible_cpus(), for_each_possible_cpu(), etc
> > #70: FILE: mm/kmemleak.c:197:
> > +static int min_object_pool = NR_CPUS * 4;
> > 
> > WARNING: usage of NR_CPUS is often wrong - consider using cpu_possible(), num_possible_cpus(), for_each_possible_cpu(), etc
> > #71: FILE: mm/kmemleak.c:198:
> > +static int min_scan_area_pool = NR_CPUS * 1;
> > 
> > There can be situations where NR_CPUS is much larger than
> > num_possible_cpus().  Can we initialize these tunables within
> > kmemleak_init()?
> 
> We could and, at least on arm64, cpu_possible_mask is already
> initialised at that point. However, that's a totally made up number. I
> think we would better go for a Kconfig option (defaulting to, say, 1024)
> similar to the CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_EARLY_LOG_SIZE and we grow it if
> people report better values in the future.

If you really want/need to make this configurable then the command line
parameter makes more sense - think of distribution kernel users for
example. But I am still not sure why this is really needed. The initial
size is a "made up" number of course. There is no good estimation to
make (without a crystal ball). The value might be increased based on
real life usage.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-01  6:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-27 13:23 [PATCH v2] mm: kmemleak: Use mempool allocations for kmemleak objects Catalin Marinas
2019-07-30 19:57 ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-30 20:22   ` Qian Cai
2019-07-30 20:39     ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-31  9:53     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-07-31 12:02       ` Qian Cai
2019-07-31 14:48         ` Catalin Marinas
2019-07-31 14:54           ` Qian Cai
2019-07-31  9:06   ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31  9:17     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-07-30 20:02 ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-31 15:44   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-01  6:41     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-08-03 10:48       ` Catalin Marinas
2019-07-31  9:10 ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190801064153.GD11627@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).