From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Steve Magnani <steve.magnani@digidescorp.com>
Cc: "Roald Strauss" <mr_lou@dewfall.dk>,
"Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UDF filesystem image with Write-Once UDF Access Type
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 09:44:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190801074404.GB25064@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35c0e9f3-b3b6-96c3-e339-2267a3abde9b@digidescorp.com>
On Fri 26-07-19 12:44:34, Steve Magnani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/12/19 5:02 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > In my opinion without support for additional layer, kernel should treat
> > UDF Write-Once Access Type as read-only mount for userspace. And not
> > classic read/write mount.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > It seems that udf.ko does not support updating VAT table, so probably it
> > should treat also filesystem with VAT as read-only too.
> >
>
> I thinkb085fbe2ef7fa7489903c45271ae7b7a52b0f9ab <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/fs/udf?h=v5.1&id=b085fbe2ef7fa7489903c45271ae7b7a52b0f9ab>, deployed in 4.20,
> does both of the things you want.
>
> One case I ran across today that Windows handles, but Linux doesn't,
> is write-protection via flags in the DomainIdentifier fields of the
> Logical Volume Descriptor and File Set Descriptor. Linux allows
> RW mount when those are marked protected, but Windows forces RO mount.
Yeah, you're right. We are currently completely ignoring the
DomainIdentifier field and at least for read-write mounts we should make
sure it is valid. So that's something that needs fixing.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-01 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-12 10:02 UDF filesystem image with Write-Once UDF Access Type Pali Rohár
2019-07-26 17:44 ` Steve Magnani
2019-08-01 7:44 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2019-08-01 7:35 ` Jan Kara
2019-08-01 8:38 ` Jan Kara
2019-08-01 8:57 ` Pali Rohár
2019-08-02 10:28 ` Jan Kara
2019-08-01 8:44 ` Pali Rohár
2019-08-01 10:21 ` Roald Strauss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190801074404.GB25064@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mr_lou@dewfall.dk \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=steve.magnani@digidescorp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).