From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300BAC433FF for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 14:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAAA20679 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 14:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731785AbfHAOJQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 10:09:16 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:43803 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731377AbfHAOJQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 10:09:16 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id EEECA68AFE; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 16:09:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 16:09:13 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Lu Baolu Cc: Christoph Hellwig , David Woodhouse , Joerg Roedel , ashok.raj@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, Robin Murphy , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jacob Pan Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/vt-d: Refactor find_domain() helper Message-ID: <20190801140913.GD23435@lst.de> References: <20190801060156.8564-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20190801060156.8564-2-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20190801061021.GA14955@lst.de> <40f3a736-0a96-0491-61ad-0ddf03612d91@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40f3a736-0a96-0491-61ad-0ddf03612d91@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 02:20:07PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > On 8/1/19 2:10 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 02:01:54PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >>> + /* No lock here, assumes no domain exit in normal case */ >> >> s/exit/exists/ ? > > This comment is just moved from one place to another in this patch. > > "no domain exit" means "the domain isn't freed". (my understand) Maybe we'll get that refconfirmed and can fix up the comment? > >> >>> + info = dev->archdata.iommu; >>> + if (likely(info)) >>> + return info->domain; >> >> But then again the likely would be odd. >> > > Normally there's a domain for a device (default domain or isolation > domain for assignment cases). Makes sense, I just mean to say that the likely was contrary to my understanding of the above comment.