From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/5] x86/kvm: Handle task_work on VMENTER/EXIT
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 18:24:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190801162451.GE31538@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190801143657.887648487@linutronix.de>
On 08/01, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> @@ -8172,6 +8174,10 @@ static int vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcp
> ++vcpu->stat.signal_exits;
> break;
> }
> +
> + if (notify_resume_pending())
> + tracehook_handle_notify_resume();
shouldn't you drop kvm->srcu before tracehook_handle_notify_resume() ?
I don't understand this code at all, but vcpu_run() does this even before
cond_resched().
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-01 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-01 14:32 [patch 0/5] posix-cpu-timers: Move expiry into task work context Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 14:32 ` [patch 1/5] tracehook: Provide TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME handling for KVM Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-01 15:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 17:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-08-01 14:32 ` [patch 2/5] x86/kvm: Handle task_work on VMENTER/EXIT Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 16:24 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2019-08-01 18:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 21:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-01 21:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-01 21:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 21:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-02 21:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-02 22:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-02 22:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-08-02 12:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-08-01 14:32 ` [patch 3/5] posix-cpu-timers: Split run_posix_cpu_timers() Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 14:32 ` [patch 4/5] posix-cpu-timers: Defer timer handling to task_work Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-01 15:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 15:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-08-01 18:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 14:32 ` [patch 5/5] x86: Select POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190801162451.GE31538@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=julia@ni.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).