From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E692C433FF for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 14:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30EC721726 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 14:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="sSq7JSiL" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2395035AbfHBOuT (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:50:19 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:57146 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731205AbfHBOuS (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:50:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=wFufv2A3VsleW9NhhqWmZQk/O8vzeBMOQMi+FRL3uZk=; b=sSq7JSiLEkL/Qu7pBt+3s/Obzj G8JwPwZS1T0WVqB57yZXxCvVf2QIIawUP6uxAzuXsQq0kzkgixEE5dG0/bwZeBJsAEYi4apzeYV+q AoKjNmoU+H7PbtN1VDnh/6vE0bi1lHbWKn/LJ4w1MHHyykhWmM2YgsOSAtjW4Z4wRUns=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htYsl-0001GD-Kc; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 16:50:11 +0200 Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 16:50:11 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Tao Ren Cc: Florian Fainelli , Heiner Kallweit , "David S . Miller" , Arun Parameswaran , Justin Chen , Vladimir Oltean , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: phy: broadcom: add 1000Base-X support for BCM54616S Message-ID: <20190802145011.GH2099@lunn.ch> References: <20190801235839.290689-1-taoren@fb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190801235839.290689-1-taoren@fb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > +static int bcm54616s_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev) > +{ > + int err; > + > + err = genphy_read_status(phydev); > + > + /* 1000Base-X register set doesn't provide speed fields: the > + * link speed is always 1000 Mb/s as long as link is up. > + */ > + if (phydev->dev_flags & PHY_BCM_FLAGS_MODE_1000BX && > + phydev->link) > + phydev->speed = SPEED_1000; > + > + return err; > +} This function is equivalent to bcm5482_read_status(). You should use it, rather than add a new function. Andrew