From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46B9C32750 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 17:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728452173E for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 17:01:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1564765268; bh=G5MFfB3qOMn5gxbxtDF7WDU8ixM0pOe/XrgOFMI6GhU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=gEf/3f6KW2gGtrdc5uTIUBNi+WiOM4zM3drfgQTunlbpm4IIL/+SUpgu2orHU9wBc 4baQIcUbpA1gK9NVLyj/Zq1JAdY1GgsWZWtlWsve0YaKXmtuYqhF4S1g7rzdXEgx8w EPiYNocupg4b3PPtUxgk3wzSutPKteJ5lDn7zuVc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2403880AbfHBRBH (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2019 13:01:07 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34912 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389673AbfHBRBG (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2019 13:01:06 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [106.51.106.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D83A20644; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 17:01:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1564765266; bh=G5MFfB3qOMn5gxbxtDF7WDU8ixM0pOe/XrgOFMI6GhU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=iftsDOtZDbBY/aOE5Z4zZY9Zk2DsxluNVzmp4CZ0A3964H2M03tWHDDx88nk4Eb3P t9ypQwonCUQNRqZ5XeFVBupT3WLs5pXlCdGvWQClFlcpfkT9Y2CgRGtuAdgwp2q8nJ iSYj3+/Ozhs/3zRuCqHKCarZ6Jr8rlVhDIdhTbBs= Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 22:29:52 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Pierre-Louis Bossart Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tiwai@suse.de, broonie@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jank@cadence.com, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, slawomir.blauciak@intel.com, Sanyog Kale Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 18/40] soundwire: bus: split handling of Device0 events Message-ID: <20190802165952.GV12733@vkoul-mobl.Dlink> References: <20190725234032.21152-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <20190725234032.21152-19-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190725234032.21152-19-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25-07-19, 18:40, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > Assigning a device number to a Slave will result in additional events > when it reports its status in a PING frame. There is no point in > dealing with all the other devices in a loop, this can be done when a > non-device0 event happens. Applied, thanks -- ~Vinod