From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDF6C433FF for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 17:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124C121993 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 17:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="Slbetn8k" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388731AbfHGRV2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Aug 2019 13:21:28 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com ([209.85.128.66]:55279 "EHLO mail-wm1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729960AbfHGRV0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Aug 2019 13:21:26 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f66.google.com with SMTP id p74so803836wme.4 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 10:21:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E2EJNQPnOEl3GZNAxpz5JJlhH5o76gr2JP/NdmhEjGs=; b=Slbetn8k4h8b+dLP23JOZzACY2KPtfhEdyy4tIy1t0kM6CLvwNMntuGC8OWdSosCwC Mn1hdHbI42z8YdGqz3QU3H5n2snOQDR/snOwPv52MyekKooNtPIfnm8/xJm1l0R1kd0v GB4Vw1raWpROllTv0w7r/AdyRxKhXb7T0BrhMDejdNdArhaNlj9/4IFqRsPN27rghRaR IroQlGR7jYdWs4YoT8GQbtavA8dOdKl7/jOIXcNFH4NePAZfTYGplEszVQK4o9k/HSoL 65ECmXVSCxDJFQtPd4UuGfmfXGDqliW49oP8V/KGMXudqKR8YfhlR0rej4aMYD4dlDyC uKqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E2EJNQPnOEl3GZNAxpz5JJlhH5o76gr2JP/NdmhEjGs=; b=qXb+HyzRPp2TJkAE/KimJQWrD8Yv+GsvK0jzNPQlaXJrNlOVSyPdXlMa3TLig1FqoK WCXp1qts+YNaouT9fkFWAZeaf4CayQew6luuEqMyUBLNR5tdXJ1xm8tEOExDRBzr7ADk qOYJDXf6TxoRvh2t9wifMM9P1rTm5Gl5oa8qlKz1NVFkEqt6Ltl/0D+ot/dcJozu/W5K ldkday4CIUZVHnBJJaAdiEeB26d+LBffTe/m9/2sD0VJ0+BqbaTY8ZztP6ugou1ta2Te 7l6b73p5CTnQHFyPYznYCVLx7oLx73vgX7mFS1Jj1VOI0Qr+9whack14R0qw4LlFDSDs vC7A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW43s/fGPqTRyAjERNeXES6d2HCiX0im3tFZZ4CfGRsNvOa+kPe HKKVHjemC0qdsjZFB1WPrHT3WQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzBdRIfE+HrknLNxY/zsTEgRLTff26RF5t3imH7y4D5rR5RbsMu8UTWdbsANsG2R+dUMRYXXg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:751a:: with SMTP id o26mr920609wmc.13.1565198484766; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 10:21:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (88-147-66-140.dyn.eolo.it. [88.147.66.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q193sm586773wme.8.2019.08.07.10.21.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Aug 2019 10:21:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Paolo Valente To: Jens Axboe , linux@roeck-us.net Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com, oleksandr@natalenko.name, Paolo Valente , Hsin-Yi Wang , Nicolas Boichat , Doug Anderson Subject: [BUGFIX 1/1] block, bfq: handle NULL return value by bfq_init_rq() Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 19:21:11 +0200 Message-Id: <20190807172111.4718-2-paolo.valente@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190807172111.4718-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> References: <20190807172111.4718-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org As reported in [1], the call bfq_init_rq(rq) may return NULL in case of OOM (in particular, if rq->elv.icq is NULL because memory allocation failed in failed in ioc_create_icq()). This commit handles this circumstance. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/22/824 Reported-by: Guenter Roeck Reported-by: Hsin-Yi Wang Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang Cc: Nicolas Boichat Cc: Doug Anderson Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 14 +++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 586fcfe227ea..32686300d89b 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2250,9 +2250,14 @@ static void bfq_request_merged(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req, blk_rq_pos(container_of(rb_prev(&req->rb_node), struct request, rb_node))) { struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bfq_init_rq(req); - struct bfq_data *bfqd = bfqq->bfqd; + struct bfq_data *bfqd; struct request *prev, *next_rq; + if (!bfqq) + return; + + bfqd = bfqq->bfqd; + /* Reposition request in its sort_list */ elv_rb_del(&bfqq->sort_list, req); elv_rb_add(&bfqq->sort_list, req); @@ -2299,6 +2304,9 @@ static void bfq_requests_merged(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bfq_init_rq(rq), *next_bfqq = bfq_init_rq(next); + if (!bfqq) + return; + /* * If next and rq belong to the same bfq_queue and next is older * than rq, then reposition rq in the fifo (by substituting next @@ -5436,12 +5444,12 @@ static void bfq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq, spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock); bfqq = bfq_init_rq(rq); - if (at_head || blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq)) { + if (!bfqq || at_head || blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq)) { if (at_head) list_add(&rq->queuelist, &bfqd->dispatch); else list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &bfqd->dispatch); - } else { /* bfqq is assumed to be non null here */ + } else { idle_timer_disabled = __bfq_insert_request(bfqd, rq); /* * Update bfqq, because, if a queue merge has occurred -- 2.20.1