From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B82BC32751 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 01:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39C2217D7 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 01:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="ul9uHSv2" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389518AbfHHBBN (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Aug 2019 21:01:13 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:47775 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387536AbfHHBBN (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Aug 2019 21:01:13 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 463qnK0hXRz9sN6; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:01:09 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1565226071; bh=MsMFPAr56dFY8txzKEu0S50XsC7x6UWlqVj387uslpE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ul9uHSv2Ta3v3XNn4l0MbL7N55D+LloSbQoLFOMCydtRMR2w64dbN2GNiSq4Q4iVL auqDYaV3U9Rm736O4eZ4XEyF4qFkBDRqIStHXY6JBXedpNhm+xN+qFWHlFxxC3gIBo qwHRKRVFPaQ8JrQPwJgM4lPDerygjqIQ1eLt0/CI54EAHMhhE/ddu7qADHl0gKuJUU 9Y1OC96+/Cm/h5LBJgyNZmS8yopeCvRXy7dA9DGXoFVb16PEGN1lc2TwKpFa78KhVE J1VSHRjVp7fVo+kDdHjWaOLEaOFkximdMWSIIMvfnBswO0y/s9OtWGnMarmYLWB2LJ qxIFiOKzVJ5IQ== Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:01:08 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: open list , Linux-Next Mailing List , kishon@ti.com, heiko@sntech.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: Linux next-20190807: arm64: build failed - phy-rockchip-inno-hdmi.c:1046:26: error: anonymous bit-field has negative width (-1) Message-ID: <20190808110108.2db1b128@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/PnbChS=XA/gL0CFTVs6ccQo"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/PnbChS=XA/gL0CFTVs6ccQo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Naresh, On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 16:48:15 +0530 Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > Linux next 20190807 arm64 default config build failed due to below error. >=20 > /drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-hdmi.c:1046:26: error: > anonymous bit-field has negative width (-1) > inno_write(inno, 0xc6, RK3328_TERM_RESISTOR_CALIB_SPEED_7= _0(v)); > ^ > ../drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-hdmi.c:201:50: note: > expanded from macro 'RK3328_TERM_RESISTOR_CALIB_SPEED_7_0' > #define RK3328_TERM_RESISTOR_CALIB_SPEED_7_0(x) UPDATE(x, 7, 9) > ^ > ../drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-hdmi.c:24:42: note: expanded > from macro 'UPDATE' > #define UPDATE(x, h, l) (((x) << (l)) & GENMASK((h), (l))) > ^ > ../include/linux/bits.h:39:3: note: expanded from macro 'GENMASK' > (GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(high, low) + __GENMASK(high, low)) > ^ > ../include/linux/bits.h:24:18: note: expanded from macro 'GENMASK_INPUT_C= HECK' > ((unsigned long)BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(__builtin_choose_expr( \ > ^ > ../include/linux/build_bug.h:16:47: note: expanded from macro > 'BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO' > #define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) (sizeof(struct { int:(-!!(e)); })) >=20 > Config link, > https://storage.kernelci.org/next/master/next-20190807/arm64/defconfig/cl= ang-8/kernel.config >=20 > Build link, > https://storage.kernelci.org/next/master/next-20190807/arm64/defconfig/cl= ang-8/build.log I think the patch that caused this has been removed form linux-next for today (it had other problems as well). --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/PnbChS=XA/gL0CFTVs6ccQo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl1LdFQACgkQAVBC80lX 0GzDtgf/aEnfScThkUKIL3HX/GJiKdIkq1RrUzMyRCDBGdYLXLEqa5AkuWd6x0qb 9MkNVLdg6ZatO2+T1JMstagNLw6X8ts3zQczqd/10e1mBlB2cw2jdO7jbLRmEO0m fz2igYmPkgFEN2ErYfwxdx0emqHpLkt0unV6TfSGNIt83isODNkH0YKS7LrSK+PK FDGj+eCgSFt8xjQ4Cpz+4XMngun6OMn8nRVCGj0kcRlDBvtSavxzQCFmI9HzF7Yn fHQ85Zg7m17qilNAJ+8HgjA5t5u18471SQxsgPujsuP1iWvRgdA5hzFujmFLpLDf Jxlds7woEgx7Q41L5gg56wTFwJs8Sw== =u6RM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/PnbChS=XA/gL0CFTVs6ccQo--