From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E710AC31E40 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 17:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2B020B7C for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 17:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="VOhJowUj" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2436549AbfHIR3J (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Aug 2019 13:29:09 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:46364 "EHLO mail-pg1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726157AbfHIR3J (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Aug 2019 13:29:09 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id w3so8977198pgt.13; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 10:29:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=2l2uOku7IZIdjpnDK2uRPlXP2kUl+VlcuE2o6tTh0qM=; b=VOhJowUjF7HpnqkbCxFXoMMEq+gVRzXhe2DBlCi5etX6yBcO+JO9bVYCXJ/BLxX2hH b3zbUhe+0LS72aW1bQNp/HRElRZdWKfB2/UDhSrBegbUf7F3Vv/dB40zVLC/cIKEuCnE B3zZwPUe+jwI13wD9XaNQtuAyf5kdJFLc4AG6jVf9cIIuRZPHJX1j68EPknjWq7sJylT 5aLe3V6gf6IKWhRWsUPV/ETZ5SEPhJP3qukNKXp2whMHT92dzlpPkJbhXKqePZ/OD8rU gmZVdIbvb9iDRmVMUraebYkz2F9EhJv8Ye9yffKS0JzBNE9qLSXdAP4XI1Fj/mZ6addv c6sA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2l2uOku7IZIdjpnDK2uRPlXP2kUl+VlcuE2o6tTh0qM=; b=R6SFi+r4UmLY+9gBtCDl15t1DVO39tcqSsVRGnOFRlzF/JGiKvlqIAj8ps5u0INMGL ihVKNiNkyPyhqERu5QoP50hzrp+shqaF9sl/TG3WmtJlmxw30nVBhue8KXgwwWqWpdJK 6b+R5M761wXUAjlrqhPMNFkPXmiFZF4OFPq4pYBDSktqBgDHKdydss5ywHF98FCdoB0/ 0TbWDUgWhY3a3Zh6qvoql4dyp7A6U/lxasXtflRx2LvDVQdwN7rJIPRwIPgZfx5Lso95 Zb/uRJe6YdxW/P2DLQ8I9ZsJ8H3jHDskRzuUM+lkvxqgG5Wi+i6tVhYYTLkhwlSMepAB 53tg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXDJTXUlKg8R9NnPBmuGlxESayGbfU8g1WkFMmSntqufmmzRhIQ +joY4ZqyJ9K7PhwbMJOW8Xo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqypywdRwkvnpkLb0alAWpcF3w1UWCqaPzX3ClRIQhWQ+QJv1naaOve6ISzMPMzRpujrUVKiJw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:9301:: with SMTP id p1mr10439917pjo.22.1565371748343; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 10:29:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g1sm161190879pgg.27.2019.08.09.10.29.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Aug 2019 10:29:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 10:29:06 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Paul Cercueil Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck , od@zcrc.me, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] watchdog: jz4740: Driver update Message-ID: <20190809172906.GA21450@roeck-us.net> References: <20190809115930.6050-1-paul@crapouillou.net> <20190809165207.GA18104@roeck-us.net> <1565369726.2091.0@crapouillou.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1565369726.2091.0@crapouillou.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 06:55:26PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > > Le ven. 9 août 2019 à 18:52, Guenter Roeck a écrit : > >On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:59:27PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> This patchset comes from a bigger patchset that was cut in smaller > >> pieces for easier integration to mainline. > >> (The patchset was https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/27/1837) > >> > >> The reviews were kept since the code mostly didn't change. The > >>exception > >> is the use of device_node_to_regmap() in patch 2/3. This function was > >> added in a prior patch, now merged in the MIPS tree. > >> > >> For that reason this patchset is based on the ingenic-tcu-v5.4 branch > >>of > >> the MIPS tree > >> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mips/linux.git). > >> > > > >What is the expectation here ? Should the series be sent upstream > >through the watchdog tree, or through some other tree ? > > You can get it through the watchdog tree if you merge the ingenic-tcu-v5.4 > branch from the MIPS tree. If you'd rather not do that, I can get it merged > through the MIPS tree. > I would prefer a merge through the mips tree. Guenter