From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5119C3A59C for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 21:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9648320644 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 21:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="u56HSM/E" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732106AbfHOVcI (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 17:32:08 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f195.google.com ([209.85.214.195]:38538 "EHLO mail-pl1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730302AbfHOVcI (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 17:32:08 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f195.google.com with SMTP id m12so1549093plt.5; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 14:32:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=Idm/sRzCLkJoZ8POkQj4Iwvd94HkK/rVkPPXXGAJ/gM=; b=u56HSM/EnOPuGAMgd3co6Hm10P3MOchXfnSEoF1hUb+ke3OKHHcFEZQ25KHXFMjGuV a5Mrkt8noBS+ws7JcTfqZxAJZOD/qo0ChjH6S8ykJf/V6jACR+8EuBcZrY3WLdEggylE IvGRdpEqDPjgIDoOdQe9Y5/7qbF4SO4qrAlxZvsVZt/Gk9tTk+j07KBMUwXQtDgigHzo 0SQ+ahsslBNYC6B/TE2ehCxHcurlQYvH+UmCbayXlBRCRK8JCj3UTAwHePkHxS+fOtRz 16Am/xyT9K20LFzV38swneROVGRhK9QVYOvDW20JA7qjLNhtNY/tTmiweiXTr8JRUMy/ 248A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Idm/sRzCLkJoZ8POkQj4Iwvd94HkK/rVkPPXXGAJ/gM=; b=YUH9GGj5RAmQyXF1xXOkgnQBKoP88plMaLC3NE6Dtoo+vqHCEPqVgVZ6v3VgYokK9E CiNlH2TAF8zAdrQYfMd8B8rayzIr1atsZqAHt4H80pEyd9n65cHlyNwCLzJXEFS/YdjW Ejy4E0fqt/3ewMWUdTk8X7WugHXF7FJF++ebkzUle/PljMT1k0g33DyBlUjqPTxtoMLi e87uguo+mSm09D+x2UykBuWQDieS8PW93CwSNR4hdG3/qHOdtcRxWXu2D9eyQ4kikka4 whIH5xcUvni3OHpwd94xKGpReHxEbspisEtApmE8qxp+kNsFmnK4m26L4mDDLAqgPgl8 WjYg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWsai5/ypVnho4p0zCoHJ2lmMCvzkWqahKM4Q0jajb7zjAvuodF hmR7x6p1KjgLoFW3DykP5+o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqziOjk3Xl0b8pqfMGrWTSSZIcTHcdtskiYehLF7hfSEwzslPPVAR2Bzc0JrQZhYG/CN+MvTtw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8d95:: with SMTP id v21mr6207993plo.267.1565904727851; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 14:32:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x128sm4481147pfd.52.2019.08.15.14.32.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 14:32:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 14:32:05 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=EDaz?= , open list , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Andrew Morton , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, Ben Hutchings , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/91] 4.19.67-stable review Message-ID: <20190815213205.GA11036@roeck-us.net> References: <20190814165748.991235624@linuxfoundation.org> <20190815193716.GG30437@kroah.com> <20190815202004.GA1192@roeck-us.net> <20190815204221.GA6782@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190815204221.GA6782@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:42:21PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 01:20:04PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 09:37:16PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 08:58:55AM -0500, Daniel Díaz wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 08:29, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 8/14/19 10:00 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.67 release. > > > > > > There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Fri 16 Aug 2019 04:55:34 PM UTC. > > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Building x86_64:tools/perf ... failed > > > > > -------------- > > > > > Error log: > > > > > Warning: arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h differs from kernel > > > > > Warning: arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h differs from kernel > > > > > PERF_VERSION = 4.9.189.ge000f87 > > > > > util/machine.c: In function ‘machine__create_module’: > > > > > util/machine.c:1088:43: error: ‘size’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘die’? > > > > > if (arch__fix_module_text_start(&start, &size, name) < 0) > > > > > ^~~~ > > > > > die > > > > > util/machine.c:1088:43: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > > > > > > > > We noticed this exact failure but not on 4.19. For us, 4.19's perf builds fine. > > > > > > > > On 4.9, perf failed with the error you described, as it looks like > > > > it's missing 9ad4652b66f1 ("perf record: Fix wrong size in > > > > perf_record_mmap for last kernel module"), though I have not verified > > > > yet. > > > > > > I've queued that up now, and will push out the 4.9-rc tree, so let's see > > > if that fixes it or not. > > > > > I think you may have pushed the 4.19 branch. Sorry for the confusion > > I caused by attributing the problem to the wrong branch. > > Ah, I did, good catch. I've pushed the 4.9 one now. At least I applied > the patch to the correct branch :) > Confirmed fixed with v4.9.189-42-g9a2a343109e5. Thanks, Guenter