From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E591AC3A5A0 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 12:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD1420851 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 12:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="U6P+VhD9" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727442AbfHSMOD (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 08:14:03 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f196.google.com ([209.85.160.196]:43962 "EHLO mail-qt1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727084AbfHSMOD (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 08:14:03 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f196.google.com with SMTP id b11so1559517qtp.10 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:14:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=nRWNZuiGM6/Q6mNBegXMuI8+3hZyUA0ed2caq3zIE+s=; b=U6P+VhD9qiNyTYj/vf8py7Y/7crTZzN75pXRcqHoBbCIFkdKtT5gnzrsKgDxgRENa9 nP0ZvR/Rzpsff8cZYlp+r9fhRAzqTvCsv1xKbfzASRmL2mBQmHPW7mHhf+y2MrxgAEq2 z5kj/Sef0erIiPVm/D03V2rIJdtlaA+U5KeAeb4juYjhtY39EII1X3srd+MF4Q+9N0P8 7g3oOUoFlC15XevcwiLH/KJD9rNTYGTfEWQ8yc6bU4dLSAupVAMj0mN8jrogCBwlnynl xyS3YmvcTut9/H2qBiMuEFtP2syUERBEOuZdZQaf1HrnzgfWzCiZ2xpYrAZaXmAZi7dz f2TA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=nRWNZuiGM6/Q6mNBegXMuI8+3hZyUA0ed2caq3zIE+s=; b=XGlj8uFaBY2q6QViiWg6Y42qWQefP6VryM+Yar31Xdh4oWvTC5oRoPzg4OQkb7J30o elB5XFvcivAPT1dv5j5laK9qqLOIaftF5AToX5nyIeB9DpgOn0VFw9hAA8dtZm5TmBK1 l5zysL3+0Ux6W0B3xP2TebxlR1Mu3ucnpWpcCZqBvSYk1DfbUGLTpPJIkzCgGzGst6Gx +rm38eDUQqsAn7MOC8//33KAfmvtqTRqJFmLjx8rqSeb2EYIsF2I2WlbuvYYoHX5vBe9 5+9hC5hJLEWNAZdBfe0firRx5AXVQDCeaazCaUpBmzDZOu3+/6SGJJrB0kyJnhGL7TdR t6CA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVl7/7gwKfTVa1oRbiUgR79gbr+0TPB4G6XtbUXo8yyvx+YN6YE 9J4I4Xq9+wyO7gDMDgV1aOMu+A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwN4pdYCYxd3MvQTpQ8D79Ai3jAM67fFwyK83IAnQZdMnMVUiL20ASrtgdX+jnuaZg29D/D/Q== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e6cc:: with SMTP id l12mr10046715qvn.60.1566216842063; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-156-34-55-100.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [156.34.55.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x206sm6898059qkb.127.2019.08.19.05.14.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 05:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jgg by mlx.ziepe.ca with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hzgXw-0001YF-Va; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:14:00 -0300 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:14:00 -0300 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Doug Ledford , Bernard Metzler , "Torvalds, Linus" , linux-rdma , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git Message-ID: <20190819121400.GA5058@ziepe.ca> References: <09bcafaab07dfde728357bfe61b6a7edfa3b25c9.camel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:08:16PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Doug, Bernard, > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:00 PM Doug Ledford wrote: > > Fairly small pull request for -rc3. I'm out of town the rest of this > > week, so I made sure to clean out as much as possible from patchworks in > > enough time for 0-day to chew through it (Yay! for 0-day being back > > online! :-)). Jason might send through any emergency stuff that could > > pop up, otherwise I'm back next week. > > > > The only real thing of note is the siw ABI change. Since we just merged > > siw *this* release, there are no prior kernel releases to maintain > > kernel ABI with. I told Bernard that if there is anything else about > > the siw ABI he thinks he might want to change before it goes set in > > stone, he should get it in ASAP. The siw module was around for several > > years outside the kernel tree, and it had to be revamped considerably > > for inclusion upstream, so we are making no attempts to be backward > > compatible with the out of tree version. Once 5.3 is actually released, > > we will have our baseline ABI to maintain. > > [...] > > > - Allow siw to be built on 32bit arches (siw, ABI change, but OK since > > siw was just merged this merge window and there is no prior released > > kernel to maintain compatibility with and we also updated the > > rdma-core user space package to match) > > > Bernard Metzler (1): > > RDMA/siw: Change CQ flags from 64->32 bits > > Obviously none of this was ever compiled for a 32-bit platform?!? It is puzzling that 0-day or anyone testing linux-next hasn't noticed this in that last 7 weeks are so.. Jason