Re: [RFC v4 02/18] objtool: orc: Refactor ORC API for other architectures to implement.

[Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:23:47PM +0100, Raphael Gault wrote:
> The ORC unwinder is only supported on x86 at the moment and should thus be
> in the x86 architecture code. In order not to break the whole structure in
> case another architecture decides to support the ORC unwinder via objtool

> we choose to let the implementation be done in the architecture dependent
> code.

A general comment for all the patch descriptions: they should use
imperative language, like:

  "move the implementation to the architecture-specific code."

Also the subjects shouldn't have periods.

It would be a good idea to review
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.

> --- a/tools/objtool/orc_gen.c
> +++ b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/orc_gen.c
> @@ -6,11 +6,11 @@
>  #include <stdlib.h>
>  #include <string.h>
>  
> -#include "orc.h"
> -#include "check.h"
> -#include "warn.h"
> +#include "../../orc.h"
> +#include "../../check.h"
> +#include "../../warn.h"
>  
> -int create_orc(struct objtool_file *file)
> +int arch_create_orc(struct objtool_file *file)
>  {
>  	struct instruction *insn;
>  
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static int create_orc_entry(struct section *u_sec, struct section *ip_relasec,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -int create_orc_sections(struct objtool_file *file)
> +int arch_create_orc_sections(struct objtool_file *file)
>  {
>  	struct instruction *insn, *prev_insn;
>  	struct section *sec, *u_sec, *ip_relasec;
> @@ -209,3 +209,97 @@ int create_orc_sections(struct objtool_file *file)
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +int arch_orc_read_unwind_hints(struct objtool_file *file)
> +{

For naming consistency, please give them all an arch_orc prefix.  Also I
think arch_create_orc() should have a more specific name anyway, maybe
arch_orc_init().  So:

arch_orc_init()
arch_orc_create_sections()
arch_orc_read_unwind_hints()

-- 
Josh