From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFECC3A59B for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 20:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EC523429 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 20:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728208AbfH3UOq (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:14:46 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46904 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728117AbfH3UOp (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:14:45 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 970F823427; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 20:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:14:42 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: "Naveen N. Rao" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: two fixes with func_probes handling Message-ID: <20190830161442.5bae24da@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <1565277255.xyq4vg2zkj.naveen@linux.ibm.com> References: <1565277255.xyq4vg2zkj.naveen@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 08 Aug 2019 20:45:04 +0530 "Naveen N. Rao" wrote: > Naveen N. Rao wrote: > > Two patches addressing bugs in ftrace function probe handling. The first > > patch addresses a NULL pointer dereference reported by LTP tests, while > > the second one is a trivial patch to address a missing check for return > > value, found by code inspection. > > Steven, > Can you please take a look at these patches? > Sorry for the late reply, I've been traveling a lot lately. I'm looking at these now. I'm trying to see how they triggered a bug. -- Steve