From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] sched: make struct task_struct::state 32-bit
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:13:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190903071326.GV2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190903065155.GA28322@infradead.org>
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:51:55PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 12:05:58AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > 32-bit accesses are shorter than 64-bit accesses on x86_64.
> > Nothing uses 64-bitness of ->state.
> >
> > Space savings are ~2KB on F30 kernel config.
>
> I guess we'd save even more when moving from a volatile to
> WRITE_ONCE/READ_ONCE..
I doubt it; pretty much all accesses really should be using that.
Not saying we shouldn't maybe do that; but that's going to be massive
churn.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-03 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-02 21:05 [PATCH] sched: make struct task_struct::state 32-bit Alexey Dobriyan
2019-09-02 23:02 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-09-03 16:23 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2019-09-03 16:31 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-09-03 6:51 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-03 7:13 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-09-03 17:29 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-09-03 18:19 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2019-09-03 21:51 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-09-04 12:07 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-09-04 17:48 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-09-05 15:51 ` Markus Elfring
2019-09-05 16:52 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-09-23 10:26 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-09-23 10:34 ` Julia Lawall
2019-09-23 11:26 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-09-23 11:43 ` Julia Lawall
2019-09-23 13:23 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-09-24 8:28 ` Markus Elfring
2019-09-24 8:07 ` Markus Elfring
2019-09-04 9:43 ` [PATCH] " David Laight
2019-09-04 10:25 ` Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190903071326.GV2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).