Hi Laurent, On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 03:05:17AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > (Question for Daniel below) > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 03:51:54PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > > When resuming from system suspend, the DU driver is responsible for > > reprogramming and enabling the CMM unit if it was in use at the time > > the system entered the suspend state. > > > > Force the color_mgmt_changed flag to true if any of the DRM color > > transformation properties was set in the CRTC state duplicated at > > suspend time, as the CMM gets reprogrammed only if said flag is active in > > the rcar_du_atomic_commit_update_cmm() method. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c > > index 018480a8f35c..6e38495fb78f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ > > #include > > #include > > > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > @@ -482,6 +483,26 @@ static int rcar_du_pm_suspend(struct device *dev) > > static int rcar_du_pm_resume(struct device *dev) > > { > > struct rcar_du_device *rcdu = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > + struct drm_atomic_state *state = rcdu->ddev->mode_config.suspend_state; > > + unsigned int i; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < rcdu->num_crtcs; ++i) { > > + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &rcdu->crtcs[i].crtc; > > + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state; > > + > > + crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_existing_crtc_state(state, crtc); > > + if (!crtc_state) > > + continue; > > Shouldn't you get the new state here ? > I have followed the drm_atomic_helper_suspend() call stack, that calls drm_atomic_helper_duplicate_state() which then assign the crtct state with drm_atomic_get_crtc_state(), where I read: crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_existing_crtc_state(state, crtc); ... state->crtcs[index].state = crtc_state; state->crtcs[index].old_state = crtc->state; state->crtcs[index].new_state = crtc_state; So state or new_state for the purpose of getting back the crtc state are the same if I'm not mistaken. > > + > > + /* > > + * Force re-enablement of CMM after system resume if any > > + * of the DRM color transformation properties was set in > > + * the state saved at system suspend time. > > + */ > > + if (crtc_state->gamma_lut || crtc_state->degamma_lut || > > + crtc_state->ctm) > > We don't support degamma_lut or crm, so I would drop those. yeah, I added them as it was less code to change when we'll support them. But for now they could be removed. > > With these small issues addressed, > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > > Shouldn't we however squash this with the previous patch to avoid > bisection issues ? > Which one in your opinion? "drm: rcar-du: kms: Update CMM in atomic commit tail" ? It seems to me they do quite different things though.. Thanks j > > + crtc_state->color_mgmt_changed = true; > > Daniel, is this something that would make sense in the KMS core (or > helpers) ? > > > + } > > > > return drm_mode_config_helper_resume(rcdu->ddev); > > } > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart