From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=AnJR=XA=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D06CC43331
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu,  5 Sep 2019 17:23:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8403F206A3
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu,  5 Sep 2019 17:23:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S2390969AbfIERXp (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:23:45 -0400
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49440 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1731361AbfIERXn (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:23:43 -0400
Received: from oasis.local.home (bl11-233-114.dsl.telepac.pt [85.244.233.114])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 419EF20693;
        Thu,  5 Sep 2019 17:23:41 +0000 (UTC)
Date:   Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:23:34 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc:     Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, davem@davemloft.net,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/skbuff: silence warnings under memory pressure
Message-ID: <20190905132334.52b13d95@oasis.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20190905113208.GA521@jagdpanzerIV>
References: <20190903185305.GA14028@dhcp22.suse.cz>
        <1567546948.5576.68.camel@lca.pw>
        <20190904061501.GB3838@dhcp22.suse.cz>
        <20190904064144.GA5487@jagdpanzerIV>
        <20190904065455.GE3838@dhcp22.suse.cz>
        <20190904071911.GB11968@jagdpanzerIV>
        <20190904074312.GA25744@jagdpanzerIV>
        <1567599263.5576.72.camel@lca.pw>
        <20190904144850.GA8296@tigerII.localdomain>
        <1567629737.5576.87.camel@lca.pw>
        <20190905113208.GA521@jagdpanzerIV>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 20:32:08 +0900
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think we can queue significantly much less irq_work-s from printk().
> 
> Petr, Steven, what do you think?

What if we just rate limit the wake ups of klogd? I mean, really, do we
need to keep calling wake up if it probably never even executed?

-- Steve