From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/15] sched,fair: remove cfs_rqs from leaf_cfs_rq_list bottom up
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 15:12:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190906191237.27006-6-riel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190906191237.27006-1-riel@surriel.com>
Reducing the overhead of the CPU controller is achieved by not walking
all the sched_entities every time a task is enqueued or dequeued.
One of the things being checked every single time is whether the cfs_rq
is on the rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list.
By only removing a cfs_rq from the list once it no longer has children
on the list, we can avoid walking the sched_entity hierarchy if the bottom
cfs_rq is on the list, once the runqueues have been flattened.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index af9458d8828f..1c1593611291 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -369,6 +369,39 @@ static inline void assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(struct rq *rq)
SCHED_WARN_ON(rq->tmp_alone_branch != &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
}
+/*
+ * Because list_add_leaf_cfs_rq always places a child cfs_rq on the list
+ * immediately before a parent cfs_rq, and cfs_rqs are removed from the list
+ * bottom-up, we only have to test whether the cfs_rq before us on the list
+ * is our child.
+ */
+static inline bool child_cfs_rq_on_list(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+ struct cfs_rq *prev_cfs_rq;
+ struct list_head *prev;
+
+ prev = cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list.prev;
+ prev_cfs_rq = container_of(prev, struct cfs_rq, leaf_cfs_rq_list);
+
+ return (prev_cfs_rq->tg->parent == cfs_rq->tg);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Remove a cfs_rq from the list if it has no children on the list.
+ * The scheduler iterates over the list regularly; if conditions for
+ * removal are still true, we'll get to this cfs_rq in the future.
+ */
+static inline void list_del_leaf_cfs_rq_bottom(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+ if (!cfs_rq->on_list)
+ return;
+
+ if (child_cfs_rq_on_list(cfs_rq))
+ return;
+
+ list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
+}
+
/* Iterate thr' all leaf cfs_rq's on a runqueue */
#define for_each_leaf_cfs_rq_safe(rq, cfs_rq, pos) \
list_for_each_entry_safe(cfs_rq, pos, &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, \
@@ -7723,7 +7756,7 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
* decayed cfs_rqs linger on the list.
*/
if (cfs_rq_is_decayed(cfs_rq))
- list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
+ list_del_leaf_cfs_rq_bottom(cfs_rq);
/* Don't need periodic decay once load/util_avg are null */
if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-06 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-06 19:12 [PATCH RFC v5 0/15] sched,fair: flatten CPU controller runqueues Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 01/15] sched: introduce task_se_h_load helper Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 02/15] sched: change /proc/sched_debug fields Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 03/15] sched,fair: redefine runnable_load_avg as the sum of task_h_load Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 04/15] sched,fair: move runnable_load_avg to cfs_rq Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 06/15] sched,cfs: use explicit cfs_rq of parent se helper Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 07/15] sched,cfs: fix zero length timeslice calculation Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 08/15] sched,fair: refactor enqueue/dequeue_entity Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 09/15] sched,fair: add helper functions for flattened runqueue Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 10/15] sched,fair: flatten hierarchical runqueues Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 11/15] sched,fair: flatten update_curr functionality Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 12/15] sched,fair: propagate sum_exec_runtime up the hierarchy Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 13/15] sched,fair: ramp up task_se_h_weight quickly Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched,fair: scale vdiff in wakeup_preempt_entity Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 15/15] sched,fair: remove se->depth Rik van Riel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-08-22 2:17 [PATCH RFC v4 0/15] sched,fair: flatten CPU controller runqueues Rik van Riel
2019-08-22 2:17 ` [PATCH 05/15] sched,fair: remove cfs_rqs from leaf_cfs_rq_list bottom up Rik van Riel
2019-08-28 14:09 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190906191237.27006-6-riel@surriel.com \
--to=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).