From: Krzysztof Wilczynski <kw@linux.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: light: bh1750: Move static keyword to the front of declaration
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 15:52:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190908135208.GA29162@rocinante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190908114944.18bb78e3@archlinux>
Hello Jonathan,
Thank you for feedback.
[...]
> > drivers/iio/light/bh1750.c:64:1: warning:
> > ‘static’ is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
[...]
> This one has me confused. The warning seems to be false as static
> is at the beginning of the declaration....
>
> Sure we "could" combine the declaration with the definition as you have
> done here, but that has nothing much to do with the warning.
[...]
I only moved the "static const" at the front, I haven't changed the
code as it's already has been a declaration and definition. There is
no semicolon there and the original author put a newline to separate
things which makes it look as if these were separate.
Simple example based on the existing code:
https://godbolt.org/z/hV4HP7
I hope this helps to illustrate the change in the patch. I apologise
if my approach was incorrect.
As part of the patch I removed the newline in an aim to make it less
confusing to anyone who will read the code in the future. Especially,
since it makes it a bit awkward to read and when using things like
grep.
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-08 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-02 11:31 [PATCH] iio: light: bh1750: Move static keyword to the front of declaration Krzysztof Wilczynski
2019-09-03 17:35 ` Tomasz Duszynski
2019-09-08 10:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-09-08 13:52 ` Krzysztof Wilczynski [this message]
2019-09-10 13:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-09-10 20:25 ` Krzysztof Wilczynski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190908135208.GA29162@rocinante \
--to=kw@linux.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).