From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC3CC4CEC6 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CA720830 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731739AbfILMtu (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:49:50 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:33712 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731685AbfILMtu (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:49:50 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED01A28; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.37.6.20]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B34A3F71F; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:49:46 +0100 From: Andrew Murray To: Xiaowei Bao Cc: "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , Leo Li , "kishon@ti.com" , "lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" , "M.h. Lian" , Mingkai Hu , Roy Zang , "jingoohan1@gmail.com" , "gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "Z.q. Hou" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a Message-ID: <20190912124943.GD9720@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20190902031716.43195-1-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> <20190902031716.43195-10-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> <20190902124603.GJ9720@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1+81 (426a6c1) (2018-08-26) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 01:47:36AM +0000, Xiaowei Bao wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andrew Murray > > Sent: 2019年9月2日 20:46 > > To: Xiaowei Bao > > Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com; shawnguo@kernel.org; Leo > > Li ; kishon@ti.com; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; M.h. > > Lian ; Mingkai Hu ; Roy > > Zang ; jingoohan1@gmail.com; > > gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; > > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > > arnd@arndb.de; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; Z.q. Hou > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for > > ls1088a and ls2088a > > > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:17:14AM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote: > > > Add PCIe EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a, there are some > > > difference between LS1 and LS2 platform, so refactor the code of the > > > EP driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao > > > --- > > > v2: > > > - This is a new patch for supporting the ls1088a and ls2088a platform. > > > v3: > > > - Adjust the some struct assignment order in probe function. > > > > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 72 > > > +++++++++++++++++++------- > > > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c > > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c > > > index 5f0cb99..723bbe5 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c > > > @@ -20,27 +20,29 @@ > > > > > > #define PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET 0x1000 /* DBI2 base address*/ > > > > > > -struct ls_pcie_ep { > > > - struct dw_pcie *pci; > > > - struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc; > > > +#define to_ls_pcie_ep(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev) > > > + > > > +struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata { > > > + u32 func_offset; > > > + const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops *ops; > > > + const struct dw_pcie_ops *dw_pcie_ops; > > > }; > > > > > > -#define to_ls_pcie_ep(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev) > > > +struct ls_pcie_ep { > > > + struct dw_pcie *pci; > > > + struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc; > > > + const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata *drvdata; }; > > > > > > static int ls_pcie_establish_link(struct dw_pcie *pci) { > > > return 0; > > > } > > > > > > -static const struct dw_pcie_ops ls_pcie_ep_ops = { > > > +static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops = { > > > .start_link = ls_pcie_establish_link, }; > > > > > > -static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = { > > > - { .compatible = "fsl,ls-pcie-ep",}, > > > - { }, > > > -}; > > > - > > > static const struct pci_epc_features* ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct > > > dw_pcie_ep *ep) { @@ -87,10 +89,39 @@ static int > > > ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, > > > } > > > } > > > > > > -static const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops pcie_ep_ops = { > > > +static unsigned int ls_pcie_ep_func_conf_select(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, > > > + u8 func_no) > > > +{ > > > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); > > > + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci); > > > + > > > + WARN_ON(func_no && !pcie->drvdata->func_offset); > > > + return pcie->drvdata->func_offset * func_no; } > > > + > > > +static const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops ls_pcie_ep_ops = { > > > .ep_init = ls_pcie_ep_init, > > > .raise_irq = ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq, > > > .get_features = ls_pcie_ep_get_features, > > > + .func_conf_select = ls_pcie_ep_func_conf_select, }; > > > + > > > +static const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata ls1_ep_drvdata = { > > > + .ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops, > > > + .dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops, > > > +}; > > > + > > > +static const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata ls2_ep_drvdata = { > > > + .func_offset = 0x20000, > > > + .ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops, > > > + .dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops, > > > +}; > > > + > > > +static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = { > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls1_ep_drvdata }, > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,ls1088a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls2_ep_drvdata }, > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,ls2088a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls2_ep_drvdata }, > > > + { }, > > > > This removes support for "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" - was that intentional? If you do plan > > to drop it please make sure you explain why in the commit message. See also > > my comments in your dt-binding patch. > > In fact, the u-boot will fixup the status property to 'status = enabled' in PCI node of > the DTS base on "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" compatible, so "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" is used, I used this > compatible before, because the driver only support the LS1046a, but this time, I add > the LS1088a and LS2088a support, and these two boards have some difference form > LS1046a, so I changed the compatible. I am not sure whether need to add "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" > in there, could you give some advice, thanks a lot. It sounds like "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" can be a fallback for "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep". I'm assuming that if someone used "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep" on ls1088a or ls2088a hardware it would still work, but without the multiple PF support. I.e. if "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" is given, treat it as ls1046a. Thanks, Andrew Murray > > Thanks > Xiaowei > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Andrew Murray > > > > > }; > > > > > > static int __init ls_add_pcie_ep(struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie, @@ -103,7 > > > +134,7 @@ static int __init ls_add_pcie_ep(struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie, > > > int ret; > > > > > > ep = &pci->ep; > > > - ep->ops = &pcie_ep_ops; > > > + ep->ops = pcie->drvdata->ops; > > > > > > res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, > > "addr_space"); > > > if (!res) > > > @@ -142,20 +173,23 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct > > platform_device *pdev) > > > if (!ls_epc) > > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > > > - dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, > > "regs"); > > > - pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base); > > > - if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base)) > > > - return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base); > > > + pcie->drvdata = of_device_get_match_data(dev); > > > > > > - pci->dbi_base2 = pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET; > > > pci->dev = dev; > > > - pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops; > > > - pcie->pci = pci; > > > + pci->ops = pcie->drvdata->dw_pcie_ops; > > > > > > ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4), > > > > > > + pcie->pci = pci; > > > pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc; > > > > > > + dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, > > "regs"); > > > + pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base); > > > + if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base)) > > > + return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base); > > > + > > > + pci->dbi_base2 = pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET; > > > + > > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie); > > > > > > ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev); > > > -- > > > 2.9.5 > > >