From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
thgarnie@google.com, tytso@mit.edu, cl@linux.com,
penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
keescook@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slub: fix a deadlock in shuffle_freelist()
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:03:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190916090336.2mugbds4rrwxh6uz@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1568392064-3052-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw>
On 2019-09-13 12:27:44 [-0400], Qian Cai wrote:
…
> Chain exists of:
> random_write_wait.lock --> &rq->lock --> batched_entropy_u32.lock
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(batched_entropy_u32.lock);
> lock(&rq->lock);
> lock(batched_entropy_u32.lock);
> lock(random_write_wait.lock);
would this deadlock still occur if lockdep knew that
batched_entropy_u32.lock on CPU0 could be acquired at the same time
as CPU1 acquired its batched_entropy_u32.lock?
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-16 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-13 16:27 [PATCH] mm/slub: fix a deadlock in shuffle_freelist() Qian Cai
2019-09-16 9:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2019-09-16 14:01 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-16 19:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-16 21:31 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-17 7:16 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-18 19:59 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-25 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-25 15:18 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-25 16:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-26 12:29 ` Qian Cai
2019-10-01 9:18 ` [PATCH] sched: Avoid spurious lock dependencies Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-01 10:01 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-01 11:22 ` Qian Cai
2019-10-01 11:36 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2019-10-01 13:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-29 11:10 ` Qian Cai
2019-10-29 12:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-12 0:54 ` Qian Cai
2019-11-13 10:06 ` [tip: sched/urgent] sched/core: " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-22 20:01 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-11-22 20:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-22 21:03 ` Qian Cai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190916090336.2mugbds4rrwxh6uz@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).