linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, edubezval@gmail.com,
	agross@kernel.org, tdas@codeaurora.org, swboyd@chromium.org,
	ilina@codeaurora.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move driver initialisation earlier
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:59:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190918092925.5hrvbcdorm2qw2j4@vireshk-mac-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190918091747.GA18121@bogus>

On 18-09-19, 10:17, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Ah no, I am not referring to building as module. As you mention, that may
> work just fine. I was referring to timing dependency during boot. The idea
> is minimize the number of such initcall dependency. They should all work
> fine even as modules and should have least dependency on initcall sequence.

Yeah, so things work fine for them right now but that can be improved by
changing the sequence of boot here. And that's what Amit is trying to do here.

Even if android builds this as a module later, things will continue to work but
that may not be the best performance/boot-time wise.

When I had a discussion about this with Amit earlier, I asked him to send
patches even if he doesn't have any performance numbers for it as this is a
platform driver and I find it okay for them to decide the boot sequence that
they think is the best :)

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-18  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-11 22:32 [PATCH 0/5] Initialise thermal framework earlier during boot Amit Kucheria
2019-09-11 22:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] thermal: Initialize thermal subsystem earlier Amit Kucheria
2019-09-16 20:00   ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-17  9:18     ` Amit Kucheria
2019-09-19 14:13       ` Zhang Rui
2019-09-11 22:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] cpufreq: Initialise the governors in core_initcall Amit Kucheria
2019-09-17  8:17   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-09-11 22:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] cpufreq: Initialize cpufreq-dt driver earlier Amit Kucheria
2019-09-17  8:18   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-09-11 22:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] clk: qcom: Initialise clock drivers earlier Amit Kucheria
2019-09-16 19:54   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-17  5:44     ` Amit Kucheria
2019-09-11 22:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move driver initialisation earlier Amit Kucheria
2019-09-17  8:17   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-09-17  9:34   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-09-17 12:47     ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-17 13:05       ` Quentin Perret
2019-09-17 13:20       ` Sudeep Holla
2019-09-20 20:03         ` Amit Kucheria
2019-09-18  9:09     ` Viresh Kumar
2019-09-18  9:17       ` Sudeep Holla
2019-09-18  9:29         ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2019-09-17 12:48   ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190918092925.5hrvbcdorm2qw2j4@vireshk-mac-ubuntu \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=tdas@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).