From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Naveen Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 7/8] tracing/probe: Reject exactly same probe event
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:12:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190923102035.GA30095@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190919232400.470062819@goodmis.org>
Hey Masami, Steven
>
> +static bool trace_kprobe_has_same_kprobe(struct trace_kprobe *orig,
> + struct trace_kprobe *comp)
> +{
> + struct trace_probe_event *tpe = orig->tp.event;
> + struct trace_probe *pos;
> + int i;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(pos, &tpe->probes, list) {
> + orig = container_of(pos, struct trace_kprobe, tp);
> + if (strcmp(trace_kprobe_symbol(orig),
> + trace_kprobe_symbol(comp)) ||
> + trace_kprobe_offset(orig) != trace_kprobe_offset(comp))
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * trace_probe_compare_arg_type() ensured that nr_args and
> + * each argument name and type are same. Let's compare comm.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < orig->tp.nr_args; i++) {
> + if (strcmp(orig->tp.args[i].comm,
> + comp->tp.args[i].comm))
> + continue;
In a nested loop, *continue* is going to continue iterating through the
inner loop. In which case, continue is doing nothing here. I thought we
should have used a goto instead. No? To me, continue as a last statement of
a for loop always looks weird.
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> + }
I think we need something like this:
list_for_each_entry(pos, &tpe->probes, list) {
orig = container_of(pos, struct trace_kprobe, tp);
if (strcmp(trace_kprobe_symbol(orig),
trace_kprobe_symbol(comp)) ||
trace_kprobe_offset(orig) != trace_kprobe_offset(comp))
continue;
/*
* trace_probe_compare_arg_type() ensured that nr_args and
* each argument name and type are same. Let's compare comm.
*/
for (i = 0; i < orig->tp.nr_args; i++) {
if (strcmp(orig->tp.args[i].comm,
comp->tp.args[i].comm))
goto outer_loop;
}
return true;
outer_loop:
}
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
>
......
> +static bool trace_uprobe_has_same_uprobe(struct trace_uprobe *orig,
> + struct trace_uprobe *comp)
> +{
> + struct trace_probe_event *tpe = orig->tp.event;
> + struct trace_probe *pos;
> + struct inode *comp_inode = d_real_inode(comp->path.dentry);
> + int i;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(pos, &tpe->probes, list) {
> + orig = container_of(pos, struct trace_uprobe, tp);
> + if (comp_inode != d_real_inode(orig->path.dentry) ||
> + comp->offset != orig->offset)
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * trace_probe_compare_arg_type() ensured that nr_args and
> + * each argument name and type are same. Let's compare comm.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < orig->tp.nr_args; i++) {
> + if (strcmp(orig->tp.args[i].comm,
> + comp->tp.args[i].comm))
> + continue;
Same as above.
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-23 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-19 23:23 [for-next][PATCH 0/8] tracing: Final updates before sending to Linus Steven Rostedt
2019-09-19 23:23 ` [for-next][PATCH 1/8] ftrace: Simplify ftrace hash lookup code in clear_func_from_hash() Steven Rostedt
2019-09-19 23:23 ` [for-next][PATCH 2/8] tracing: Be more clever when dumping hex in __print_hex() Steven Rostedt
2019-09-19 23:23 ` [for-next][PATCH 3/8] tracing: Make sure variable reference alias has correct var_ref_idx Steven Rostedt
[not found] ` <20190921120618.DF81120665@mail.kernel.org>
2019-09-21 12:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-09-21 19:21 ` Sasha Levin
2019-09-21 19:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-09-19 23:23 ` [for-next][PATCH 4/8] tracing/kprobe: Fix NULL pointer access in trace_porbe_unlink() Steven Rostedt
2019-09-19 23:23 ` [for-next][PATCH 5/8] selftests/ftrace: Select an existing function in kprobe_eventname test Steven Rostedt
2019-09-19 23:23 ` [for-next][PATCH 6/8] tracing/probe: Fix to allow user to enable events on unloaded modules Steven Rostedt
2019-09-19 23:23 ` [for-next][PATCH 7/8] tracing/probe: Reject exactly same probe event Steven Rostedt
2019-09-23 10:42 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2019-09-23 17:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-09-23 17:42 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2019-09-19 23:23 ` [for-next][PATCH 8/8] selftests/ftrace: Update kprobe event error testcase Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190923102035.GA30095@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).