Re: [PATCH RT v3 3/5] sched: migrate_dis/enable: Use rt_invol_sleep

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>]

On 2019-09-24 08:53:43 [-0500], Scott Wood wrote:
> As I pointed out in the "[PATCH RT 6/8] sched: migrate_enable: Set state to
> TASK_RUNNING" discussion, we can get here inside the rtmutex code (e.g. from
> debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock) where saved_state is already holding
> something -- plus, the waker won't have WF_LOCK_SLEEPER and therefore
> saved_state will get cleared anyway.

So let me drop the saved_state pieces and get back to it once I get to
the other thread (which you replied and I didn't realised until now).

Regarding the WF_LOCK_SLEEPER part. I think this works as expected.
Imagine:

CPU0						CPU1
spin_lock();
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
…
spin_unlock()
 -> migrate_enable();
   -> stop_one_cpu();				<-- A)
other_func();					<-- B)
schedule();

So. With only CPU0 we enter schedule() with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE because
the state gets preserved with the change I added (which is expected).
If CPU1 sends a wake_up() at A) then the saved_state gets overwritten
and we enter schedule() with TASK_RUNNING. Same happens if it is sent at
B) point which is outside of any migrate/spin lock related code. 

Was this clear or did I miss the point?

> -Scott

Sebastian