From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37B7C32792 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFA821920 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.b="OqIAvAlJ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730922AbfI3LCk (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 07:02:40 -0400 Received: from mail.andi.de1.cc ([85.214.55.253]:32980 "EHLO mail.andi.de1.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730759AbfI3LCj (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 07:02:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kemnade.info; s=20180802; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=4Q2eQSaoD2aHtt1rANXm2Cc6hpmxzVEktPN68KNFqac=; b=OqIAvAlJtHFC+dzBE4XSIO2Ve+ +GF+kIQuQrXylq0OprfQ77TKbeo5rWyzgbD8EIYC5kpQqJeAxgHlMkqrqqWqxjKj1qgHYWMxv1OKZ V+PRUS55Nlw9YUBiwvNrZq7FEJ9FCX8dsBLKX5upiljQVbxbkVaBHoGK2vmqsl1uaaCM=; Received: from p200300ccff0b4c001a3da2fffebfd33a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([2003:cc:ff0b:4c00:1a3d:a2ff:febf:d33a] helo=aktux) by mail.andi.de1.cc with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEtRf-0007ix-TS; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 13:02:24 +0200 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 13:02:22 +0200 From: Andreas Kemnade To: Marco Felsch Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, andrew.smirnov@gmail.com, marex@denx.de, angus@akkea.ca, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, j.neuschaefer@gmx.net, Discussions about the Letux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: add Netronix E60K02 board common file Message-ID: <20190930130222.4e1cdf64@aktux> In-Reply-To: <20190930082715.mplf5ra35ikqmbyr@pengutronix.de> References: <20190927061423.17278-1-andreas@kemnade.info> <20190927061423.17278-2-andreas@kemnade.info> <20190927094721.w26ggnli4f5a64uv@pengutronix.de> <20190927210807.26439a94@aktux> <20190930082715.mplf5ra35ikqmbyr@pengutronix.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:27:15 +0200 Marco Felsch wrote: [..] > > so you disagree with this pattern: > > in .dtsi > > some_device { > > pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_some_device>; > > }; > > > > and in .dts (one I sent with this patch series and the tolino/mx6sl one > > is not ready-cooked yet, will be part of a later series) > > &iomuxc { > > pinctrl_some_device: some_devicegrp { > > fsl,pins = <...>; > > }; > > }; > > > > ? > > Yes, because IMHO a dtsi is self contained as well as a dts. If it is > common for all boards you can move the muxing into the dtsi else it > should be done within the dts. > well, since imx6sll-pinfunc.h is different than imx6sl-pinfunc.h, we agree that this belongs to the dts. > > > > +&snvs_rtc { > > > > + status = "disabled"; > > > > > > Same applies here. > > > > > > > No, seems to be an exception, it does not have a status = "disabled" in > > imx6sll.dtsi. > > Did you mean 6sll or 6ull? > > Okay, is this baseboard only used with a 6ull? > MCIMX6V7DVN10AB and MCIMX6L8DVN10AB So it is 6sll and 6sl (6sl support will be added in a follow-up patch series). I will send a v2 this evening, so we can all look at better-sorted things. Regards, Andreas