From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>,
Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: add __always_inline to functions called from __get_user_check()
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 09:24:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191002082454.GQ25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOd=NObDXDL3jz9ZX9wo4tn747peBJPTj0DXyLerixgL+wQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 10:03:50AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 1:37 AM Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
> >
> > KernelCI reports that bcm2835_defconfig is no longer booting since
> > commit ac7c3e4ff401 ("compiler: enable CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING
> > forcibly") (https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/26/825).
> >
> > I also received a regression report from Nicolas Saenz Julienne
> > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/27/263).
> >
> > This problem has cropped up on bcm2835_defconfig because it enables
> > CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE. The compiler tends to prefer not inlining
> > functions with -Os. I was able to reproduce it with other boards and
> > defconfig files by manually enabling CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE.
> >
> > The __get_user_check() specifically uses r0, r1, r2 registers.
> > So, uaccess_save_and_enable() and uaccess_restore() must be inlined.
> > Otherwise, those register assignments would be entirely dropped,
> > according to my analysis of the disassembly.
> >
> > Prior to commit 9012d011660e ("compiler: allow all arches to enable
> > CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING"), the 'inline' marker was always enough for
> > inlining functions, except on x86.
> >
> > Since that commit, all architectures can enable CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING.
> > So, __always_inline is now the only guaranteed way of forcible inlining.
>
> No, the C preprocessor is the only guaranteed way of inlining. I
> preferred v1; if you're going to <strikethrough>play with
> fire</strikethrough>write assembly, don't get burned.
It seems we disagree on that.
Masahiro Yamada, please send this to the patch system, thanks.
>
> >
> > I also added __always_inline to 4 functions in the call-graph from the
> > __get_user_check() macro.
> >
> > Fixes: 9012d011660e ("compiler: allow all arches to enable CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING")
> > Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@kernelci.org>
> > Reported-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Use __always_inline instead of changing the function call places
> > (per Russell King)
> > - The previous submission is: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1132459/
> >
> > arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h | 8 ++++----
> > arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
> > index 567dbede4785..f1d0a7807cd0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
> > @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
> > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15_MMU
> > -static inline unsigned int get_domain(void)
> > +static __always_inline unsigned int get_domain(void)
> > {
> > unsigned int domain;
> >
> > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline unsigned int get_domain(void)
> > return domain;
> > }
> >
> > -static inline void set_domain(unsigned val)
> > +static __always_inline void set_domain(unsigned int val)
> > {
> > asm volatile(
> > "mcr p15, 0, %0, c3, c0 @ set domain"
> > @@ -102,12 +102,12 @@ static inline void set_domain(unsigned val)
> > isb();
> > }
> > #else
> > -static inline unsigned int get_domain(void)
> > +static __always_inline unsigned int get_domain(void)
> > {
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static inline void set_domain(unsigned val)
> > +static __always_inline void set_domain(unsigned int val)
> > {
> > }
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > index 303248e5b990..98c6b91be4a8 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
> > * perform such accesses (eg, via list poison values) which could then
> > * be exploited for priviledge escalation.
> > */
> > -static inline unsigned int uaccess_save_and_enable(void)
> > +static __always_inline unsigned int uaccess_save_and_enable(void)
> > {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN
> > unsigned int old_domain = get_domain();
> > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static inline unsigned int uaccess_save_and_enable(void)
> > #endif
> > }
> >
> > -static inline void uaccess_restore(unsigned int flags)
> > +static __always_inline void uaccess_restore(unsigned int flags)
> > {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN
> > /* Restore the user access mask */
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> ~Nick Desaulniers
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-02 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-01 8:37 [PATCH v2] ARM: add __always_inline to functions called from __get_user_check() Masahiro Yamada
2019-10-01 9:03 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-10-01 17:03 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-10-02 8:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-10-02 10:45 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-10-02 13:01 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191002082454.GQ25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=allison@lohutok.net \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=info@metux.net \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).