From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E60C352AA for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 00:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C8420815 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 00:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727792AbfJBAZx (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Oct 2019 20:25:53 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:50146 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726246AbfJBAZx (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Oct 2019 20:25:53 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x920NDHF022689 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 20:25:52 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vcfjparwt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 20:25:51 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 01:25:48 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 2 Oct 2019 01:25:45 +0100 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x920Pi3659375742 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 2 Oct 2019 00:25:45 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DFDAE053; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 00:25:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61872AE056; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 00:25:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.253.14]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 00:25:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from volution.ozlabs.ibm.com (haven.au.ibm.com [9.192.254.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5C51A00F3; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 10:25:42 +1000 (AEST) Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 10:25:40 +1000 From: Daniel Black To: Keith Busch Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , "open list:ACPI" , open list , Tao Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi/hmat: ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID is deprecated in ACPI-6.3 In-Reply-To: <20190903110345.4ee753c3@volution.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <20190806042440.16445-1-daniel@linux.ibm.com> <20190903110345.4ee753c3@volution.ozlabs.ibm.com> Organization: IBM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19100200-4275-0000-0000-0000036D258A X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19100200-4276-0000-0000-000038802679 Message-Id: <20191002102540.40492b0c@volution.ozlabs.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-10-01_10:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=793 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910020000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 11:03:45 +1000 Daniel Black wrote: > On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 23:28:50 +0200 > "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:24 AM Daniel Black wrote: > > > > > > ACPI-6.3 corresponds to when hmat revision was bumped from > > > 1 to 2. In this version ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID was > > > deprecated and made reserved. > > > > > > As such in revision 2+ we shouldn't be testing this flag. > > > > > > This is as per ACPI-6.3, 5.2.27.3, Table 5-145 > > > "Memory Proximity Domain Attributes Structure" > > > for Flags. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Black > > > > Keith, any comments? > > FYI this was found when I was testing Tao Xu's qemu implementation of HMAT ACPI-6.3 which has no implementation of ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID. > > Current patch implementing Memory Proximity Domain Attributes Structure: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11125301/ On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:03:15 +0800 Tao Xu wrote: > > Looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Tao Xu Ping. Any comments?