From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: System hangs if NVMe/SSD is removed during suspend
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 15:21:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191002122136.GD2819@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
Hi Tejun,
In a system with Thunderbolt connected NVMe or SSD entering system
suspend, detaching the NVMe/SSD and resuming the system hangs (see also
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204385).
Triggering sysrq-w I see this:
[ 113.093783] Workqueue: nvme-wq nvme_remove_dead_ctrl_work [nvme]
[ 113.095156] Call Trace:
[ 113.096234] ? __schedule+0x2c5/0x630
[ 113.097409] ? wait_for_completion+0xa4/0x120
[ 113.098639] schedule+0x3e/0xc0
[ 113.099769] schedule_timeout+0x1c9/0x320
[ 113.100973] ? resched_curr+0x1f/0xd0
[ 113.102146] ? wait_for_completion+0xa4/0x120
[ 113.103379] wait_for_completion+0xc3/0x120
[ 113.104595] ? wake_up_q+0x60/0x60
[ 113.105749] __flush_work+0x131/0x1e0
[ 113.106925] ? flush_workqueue_prep_pwqs+0x130/0x130
[ 113.108215] bdi_unregister+0xb9/0x130
[ 113.109403] del_gendisk+0x2d2/0x2e0
[ 113.110580] nvme_ns_remove+0xed/0x110 [nvme_core]
[ 113.111853] nvme_remove_namespaces+0x96/0xd0 [nvme_core]
[ 113.113177] nvme_remove+0x5b/0x160 [nvme]
[ 113.114391] pci_device_remove+0x36/0x90
[ 113.115590] device_release_driver_internal+0xdf/0x1c0
[ 113.116893] nvme_remove_dead_ctrl_work+0x14/0x30 [nvme]
[ 113.118217] process_one_work+0x1c2/0x3f0
[ 113.119434] worker_thread+0x48/0x3e0
[ 113.120619] kthread+0x100/0x140
[ 113.121772] ? current_work+0x30/0x30
[ 113.122955] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
[ 113.124142] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
The exact place is in wb_shutdown():
/*
* Drain work list and shutdown the delayed_work. !WB_registered
* tells wb_workfn() that @wb is dying and its work_list needs to
* be drained no matter what.
*/
mod_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->dwork, 0);
flush_delayed_work(&wb->dwork);
Now bdi_wq is marked as WQ_FREEZABLE and at this time we are still
resuming devices so I think it is still frozen. This basically results
that the resume process is waiting for bdi_unregister() but it cannot
progress because its workqueue is still frozen.
I saw you "dealt" similar situation for libata with commit 85fbd722ad0f
("libata, freezer: avoid block device removal while system is frozen")
and that there was discussion around this here:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=138695698516487
but from that discussion I don't see more generic solution to be
implemented.
Any ideas we should fix this properly?
I mean nowadays Thunderbolt connected storage is quite common and I
suppose situation like this might wery well happen, say you have a dock
with SSD connected and you disconnect it when the laptop is suspended.
I've been using following hack to prevent the issue but I'm quite sure
there is a better solution ;-)
Thanks in advance!
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 2 ++
mm/backing-dev.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index 76d0f9de767b..3fea8d72f6f9 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -4791,6 +4791,7 @@ void ata_scsi_hotplug(struct work_struct *work)
return;
}
+#if 0
/*
* XXX - UGLY HACK
*
@@ -4810,6 +4811,7 @@ void ata_scsi_hotplug(struct work_struct *work)
#ifdef CONFIG_FREEZER
while (pm_freezing)
msleep(10);
+#endif
#endif
DPRINTK("ENTER\n");
diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index e8e89158adec..8e77711d5dd0 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -236,8 +236,8 @@ static int __init default_bdi_init(void)
{
int err;
- bdi_wq = alloc_workqueue("writeback", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_FREEZABLE |
- WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_SYSFS, 0);
+ bdi_wq = alloc_workqueue("writeback", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_UNBOUND |
+ WQ_SYSFS, 0);
if (!bdi_wq)
return -ENOMEM;
next reply other threads:[~2019-10-02 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-02 12:21 Mika Westerberg [this message]
2019-10-03 16:50 ` System hangs if NVMe/SSD is removed during suspend Tejun Heo
2019-10-04 8:03 ` Mika Westerberg
2019-10-04 9:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-04 11:01 ` Mika Westerberg
2019-10-04 13:32 ` Jens Axboe
2019-10-07 10:08 ` Jan Kara
2019-10-09 13:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191002122136.GD2819@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acelan.kao@canonical.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).