[PATCH tip/core/rcu 7/9] rcutorture: Make in-kernel-loop testing more brutal

[paulmck@kernel.org]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>

The rcu_torture_fwd_prog_nr() tests the ability of RCU to tolerate
in-kernel busy loops.  It invokes rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cond_resched()
within its delay loop, which, in PREEMPT && NO_HZ_FULL kernels results
in the occasional direct call to schedule().  Now, this direct call to
schedule() is appropriate for call_rcu() flood testing, in which either
the kernel should restrain itself or userspace transitions will supply
the needed restraint.  But in pure in-kernel loops, the occasional
cond_resched() should do the job.

This commit therefore makes rcu_torture_fwd_prog_nr() use cond_resched()
instead of rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cond_resched() in order to increase the
brutality of this aspect of rcutorture testing.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index a9e97c3..f1339ee 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -1811,7 +1811,7 @@ static void rcu_torture_fwd_prog_nr(int *tested, int *tested_tries)
 		udelay(10);
 		cur_ops->readunlock(idx);
 		if (!fwd_progress_need_resched || need_resched())
-			rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cond_resched(1);
+			cond_resched();
 	}
 	(*tested_tries)++;
 	if (!time_before(jiffies, stopat) &&
-- 
2.9.5