linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@umn.edu>,
	Stephen McCamant <smccaman@umn.edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>,
	Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@chelsio.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA: release allocated skb
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:20:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191003082048.GK5855@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEkB2EQF0D-Fdg74+E4VdxipZvTaBKseCtKJKnFg7T6ZZE9x6Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 04:35:06PM -0500, Navid Emamdoost wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. Yes, you are right if the skb release is
> moved under err4 label it will cause a double free as
> c4iw_ref_send_wait will release skb in case of error.
> So, in order to avoid leaking skb in case of c4iw_bar2_addrs failure,
> the kfree(skb) could be placed under the error check like the way
> patch v1 did. Do you see any mistake in version 1?
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1128510/

No, it is not enough.
c4iw_ref_send_wait() ->
  c4iw_wait_for_reply() ->
    return wr_waitp->ret; <--- can be -EIO

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-03  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20190923050823.GL14368@unreal>
2019-09-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v2] RDMA: release allocated skb Navid Emamdoost
2019-10-01 13:54   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-02 21:35     ` Navid Emamdoost
2019-10-03  8:20       ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2019-10-03 10:25       ` Potnuri Bharat Teja
2019-10-04 18:12         ` Navid Emamdoost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191003082048.GK5855@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=bharat@chelsio.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=emamd001@umn.edu \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=navid.emamdoost@gmail.com \
    --cc=smccaman@umn.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).