From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] regulator: s5m8767: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:10:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191004231017.130290-2-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191004231017.130290-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node() is being retired in favor of
devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index(), that behaves similar to
devm_gpiod_get_index(), but can work with arbitrary firmware node. It
will also be able to support secondary software nodes.
Let's switch this driver over.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c b/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
index 6ca27e9d5ef7..bdc07739e9a2 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
@@ -567,11 +567,10 @@ static int s5m8767_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev,
continue;
}
- rdata->ext_control_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(
+ rdata->ext_control_gpiod = devm_fwnode_gpiod_get(
&pdev->dev,
- reg_np,
- "s5m8767,pmic-ext-control-gpios",
- 0,
+ of_fwnode_handle(reg_np),
+ "s5m8767,pmic-ext-control",
GPIOD_OUT_HIGH | GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE,
"s5m8767");
if (PTR_ERR(rdata->ext_control_gpiod) == -ENOENT)
--
2.23.0.581.g78d2f28ef7-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-04 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-04 23:10 [PATCH 0/7] regulator: switch to using [devm_]fwnode_gpiod_get_index Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-04 23:10 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2019-10-05 6:42 ` [PATCH 1/7] regulator: s5m8767: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get kbuild test robot
2019-10-05 6:59 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-07 13:03 ` Applied "regulator: s5m8767: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2019-10-04 23:10 ` [PATCH 2/7] regulator: slg51000: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-05 5:36 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-07 13:03 ` Applied "regulator: slg51000: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2019-10-04 23:10 ` [PATCH 3/7] regulator: tps65090: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-07 13:03 ` Applied "regulator: tps65090: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2019-10-04 23:10 ` [PATCH 4/7] regulator: s2mps11: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-07 13:03 ` Applied "regulator: s2mps11: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2019-10-04 23:10 ` [PATCH 5/7] regulator: da9211: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-05 6:12 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-07 10:43 ` Adam Thomson
2019-10-07 13:03 ` Applied "regulator: da9211: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2019-10-04 23:10 ` [PATCH 6/7] regulator: tps65132: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get() Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-07 13:03 ` Applied "regulator: tps65132: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get()" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2019-10-04 23:10 ` [PATCH 7/7] regulator: max77686: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-05 7:26 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-07 13:03 ` Applied "regulator: max77686: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2019-10-05 19:01 ` [PATCH 0/7] regulator: switch to using [devm_]fwnode_gpiod_get_index Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191004231017.130290-2-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbkim73@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).