From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6656C4360C for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 17:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB632077B for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 17:20:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1570382429; bh=VciDMDhFHKDQEPxqkTGEW9Ps0wJxrDtXnrF0ZYnTnSc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=eeORngF2/3nH5gE26xaDwSah9Y+xuXPMl5Tk1I1HBN82ka15rCV+TQKJU43HQRzOc gH75fgg0FErBtcbSRYl21H4Ou/xBwUgWJCB21UX4vs/WQ2DwcUe3l4iFf9AxHUoOsX AgH+pVNtyiSmE2Yn0Us0nJ/F176OK+UCtUPWqIjc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727223AbfJFRU3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Oct 2019 13:20:29 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45426 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727201AbfJFRU0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Oct 2019 13:20:26 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 014A02077B; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 17:20:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1570382425; bh=VciDMDhFHKDQEPxqkTGEW9Ps0wJxrDtXnrF0ZYnTnSc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VoBk/Eb0XjDgAH1xfwz1wQwW6j1yKq2sn/pOzcI/FuUnDr0qPwEPL2UIoe5jknVqu YPEiMkqE/7hxXt29+lGiCFVthk6+dArYIZEuCwQUc9F0esaQKCZR58Bg7CJuz9udkN 7hcZRiGGtr+rJdOcAIZNAbeu/hBmB5V1UHizyjpc= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Florian Westphal , Hannes Frederic Sowa , syzbot , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 4.4 26/36] ipv6: drop incoming packets having a v4mapped source address Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 19:19:08 +0200 Message-Id: <20191006171056.399660362@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20191006171038.266461022@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20191006171038.266461022@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Eric Dumazet [ Upstream commit 6af1799aaf3f1bc8defedddfa00df3192445bbf3 ] This began with a syzbot report. syzkaller was injecting IPv6 TCP SYN packets having a v4mapped source address. After an unsuccessful 4-tuple lookup, TCP creates a request socket (SYN_RECV) and calls reqsk_queue_hash_req() reqsk_queue_hash_req() calls sk_ehashfn(sk) At this point we have AF_INET6 sockets, and the heuristic used by sk_ehashfn() to either hash the IPv4 or IPv6 addresses is to use ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&sk->sk_v6_daddr) For the particular spoofed packet, we end up hashing V4 addresses which were not initialized by the TCP IPv6 stack, so KMSAN fired a warning. I first fixed sk_ehashfn() to test both source and destination addresses, but then faced various problems, including user-space programs like packetdrill that had similar assumptions. Instead of trying to fix the whole ecosystem, it is better to admit that we have a dual stack behavior, and that we can not build linux kernels without V4 stack anyway. The dual stack API automatically forces the traffic to be IPv4 if v4mapped addresses are used at bind() or connect(), so it makes no sense to allow IPv6 traffic to use the same v4mapped class. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Cc: Florian Westphal Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa Reported-by: syzbot Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/ipv6/ip6_input.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c @@ -151,6 +151,16 @@ int ipv6_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct if (ipv6_addr_is_multicast(&hdr->saddr)) goto err; + /* While RFC4291 is not explicit about v4mapped addresses + * in IPv6 headers, it seems clear linux dual-stack + * model can not deal properly with these. + * Security models could be fooled by ::ffff:127.0.0.1 for example. + * + * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-02 + */ + if (ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&hdr->saddr)) + goto err; + skb->transport_header = skb->network_header + sizeof(*hdr); IP6CB(skb)->nhoff = offsetof(struct ipv6hdr, nexthdr);