From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] vtime: Remove pair of seqcount on context switch
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 18:20:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191007162031.GA7676@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191003161745.28464-1-frederic@kernel.org>
* Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> wrote:
> Extracted from a larger queue that fixes kcpustat on nohz_full, these
> two patches have value on their own as they remove two write barriers
> on nohz_full context switch.
>
> Frederic Weisbecker (2):
> vtime: Rename vtime_account_system() to vtime_account_kernel()
> vtime: Spare a seqcount lock/unlock cycle on context switch
>
> arch/ia64/kernel/time.c | 4 +--
> arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c | 6 ++--
> arch/s390/kernel/vtime.c | 4 +--
> include/linux/context_tracking.h | 4 +--
> include/linux/vtime.h | 38 ++++++++++++------------
> kernel/sched/cputime.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 6 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
Which tree is this against? Doesn't apply cleanly to v5.4-rc2 nor v5.3.
Does it have any prereqs perhaps?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-07 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-03 16:17 [PATCH 0/2] vtime: Remove pair of seqcount on context switch Frederic Weisbecker
2019-10-03 16:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] vtime: Rename vtime_account_system() to vtime_account_kernel() Frederic Weisbecker
2019-10-09 12:59 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/cputime: " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2019-10-03 16:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] vtime: Spare a seqcount lock/unlock cycle on context switch Frederic Weisbecker
2019-10-09 12:59 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/cputime: " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2019-10-07 16:20 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-10-07 16:51 ` [PATCH 0/2] vtime: Remove pair of seqcount " Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191007162031.GA7676@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).