From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A77ECE58E for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E007206B6 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729987AbfJHJFr (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Oct 2019 05:05:47 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:13503 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729440AbfJHJFq (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Oct 2019 05:05:46 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Oct 2019 02:05:46 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,270,1566889200"; d="scan'208";a="206603137" Received: from lahna.fi.intel.com (HELO lahna) ([10.237.72.157]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 08 Oct 2019 02:05:41 -0700 Received: by lahna (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:05:40 +0300 Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:05:40 +0300 From: Mika Westerberg To: Matthias Andree Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Lukas Wunner , Keith Busch , Alex Williamson , Alexandru Gagniuc , Kai-Heng Feng , Paul Menzel , Nicholas Johnson , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: Add missing link delays Message-ID: <20191008090540.GY2819@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20191004123947.11087-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <811277ae-bec1-1724-23ce-c13407bd79c5@gmx.de> <20191004130619.GI2819@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20191007093236.GP2819@lahna.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 05:15:24PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 07.10.19 um 11:32 schrieb Mika Westerberg: > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 09:34:41AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > >> Am 04.10.19 um 15:06 schrieb Mika Westerberg: > >>> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 02:57:21PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > >>>> Am 04.10.19 um 14:39 schrieb Mika Westerberg: > >>>>> @Matthias, @Paul and @Nicholas, I appreciate if you could check that this > >>>>> does not cause any issues for your systems. > >>>> Just to be sure: is this intended to be applied against the 5.4-rc* > >>>> master branch? > >>> Yes, it applies on top of v5.4-rc1. > >> I am sorry to say that I cannot currently test - my computer has a > >> GeForce 1060-6GB an no onboard/on-chip graphics. > >> The nvidia module 435.21 does not compile against 5.4-rc* for me (5.3.1 > >> was fine). > > I think the two patches should apply cleanly on 5.3.x as well. > > Mika, that worked. > > With your two patches on top of Linux 5.3.4, two Suspend-to-RAM cycles > (ACPI S3), one Suspend-to-disk cycle (ACPI S4), > no regressions observed => success? Yes, if it did not hang during resume (because of the PME loop) I think it should be declared as success :) Thanks a lot for testing!