From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86/fpu/xstate: Separate user and supervisor xfeatures mask Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 18:59:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20191009165921.GG10395@zn.tnic> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190925151022.21688-4-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 08:10:19AM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > Before the introduction of XSAVES supervisor states, 'xfeatures_mask' is > used at various places to determine XSAVE buffer components and XCR0 bits. > It contains only user xstates. To support supervisor xstates, it is > necessary to separate user and supervisor xstates: > > - First, change 'xfeatures_mask' to 'xfeatures_mask_all', which represents > the full set of bits that should ever be set in a kernel XSAVE buffer. > - Introduce xfeature_mask_supervisor() and xfeatures_mask_user() to xfeatures_mask_supervisor() ^ 's' is missing. > extract relevant xfeatures from xfeatures_mask_all. > > Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Similar problem here. Fenghua's SOB means what exactly? You're probably trying to say that he co-developed it but then it needs to state that this way: Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h | 2 +- > arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h | 8 ++- > arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c | 15 ++++-- > arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++------------ > 4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h > index 4c95c365058a..f56ad1248b5d 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h > @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static inline void fpstate_init_xstate(struct xregs_state *xsave) > * XRSTORS requires these bits set in xcomp_bv, or it will > * trigger #GP: > */ > - xsave->header.xcomp_bv = XCOMP_BV_COMPACTED_FORMAT | xfeatures_mask; > + xsave->header.xcomp_bv = XCOMP_BV_COMPACTED_FORMAT | xfeatures_mask_all; > } > > static inline void fpstate_init_fxstate(struct fxregs_state *fx) > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h > index 014c386deaa3..5954bd97da16 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h > @@ -51,7 +51,13 @@ > #define REX_PREFIX > #endif > > -extern u64 xfeatures_mask; > +extern u64 xfeatures_mask_all; > + > +static inline u64 xfeatures_mask_user(void) > +{ > + return xfeatures_mask_all & SUPPORTED_XFEATURES_MASK_USER; > +} Please group this function along with xfeature_is_user(), xfeature_is_supervisor() and xfeature_mask_supervisor() in the xstate.h header as they're very similar in what they do. > + > extern u64 xstate_fx_sw_bytes[USER_XSTATE_FX_SW_WORDS]; > > extern void __init update_regset_xstate_info(unsigned int size, ... > @@ -731,16 +742,22 @@ void __init fpu__init_system_xstate(void) > return; > } > > + /* > + * Find user xstates supported by the processor. > + */ > cpuid_count(XSTATE_CPUID, 0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx); > - xfeatures_mask = eax + ((u64)edx << 32); > + xfeatures_mask_all = eax + ((u64)edx << 32); > + > + /* Place supervisor features in xfeatures_mask_all here */ > Remove that newline. > - if ((xfeatures_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_FPSSE) != XFEATURE_MASK_FPSSE) { > + if ((xfeatures_mask_user() & XFEATURE_MASK_FPSSE) != XFEATURE_MASK_FPSSE) { > /* > * This indicates that something really unexpected happened > * with the enumeration. Disable XSAVE and try to continue > * booting without it. This is too early to BUG(). > */ > - pr_err("x86/fpu: FP/SSE not present amongst the CPU's xstate features: 0x%llx.\n", xfeatures_mask); > + pr_err("x86/fpu: FP/SSE not present amongst the CPU's xstate features: 0x%llx.\n", > + xfeatures_mask_all); > goto out_disable; > } > > @@ -749,10 +766,10 @@ void __init fpu__init_system_xstate(void) > */ > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(xsave_cpuid_features); i++) { > if (!boot_cpu_has(xsave_cpuid_features[i])) > - xfeatures_mask &= ~BIT(i); > + xfeatures_mask_all &= ~BIT_ULL(i); > } > > - xfeatures_mask &= fpu__get_supported_xfeatures_mask(); > + xfeatures_mask_all &= fpu__get_supported_xfeatures_mask(); > > /* Enable xstate instructions to be able to continue with initialization: */ > fpu__init_cpu_xstate(); > @@ -764,16 +781,16 @@ void __init fpu__init_system_xstate(void) > * Update info used for ptrace frames; use standard-format size and no > * supervisor xstates: > */ > - update_regset_xstate_info(fpu_user_xstate_size, > - xfeatures_mask & SUPPORTED_XFEATURES_MASK_USER); > + update_regset_xstate_info(fpu_user_xstate_size, xfeatures_mask_user()); > > fpu__init_prepare_fx_sw_frame(); > setup_init_fpu_buf(); > setup_xstate_comp(); > print_xstate_offset_size(); > > - pr_info("x86/fpu: Enabled xstate features 0x%llx, context size is %d bytes, using '%s' format.\n", > - xfeatures_mask, > + pr_info("x86/fpu: Enabled xstate features 0x%llx: user 0x%llx, context size is %d bytes, using '%s' format.\n", > + xfeatures_mask_all, > + xfeatures_mask_user(), Why do we need to dump the user features separately? > fpu_kernel_xstate_size, > boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES) ? "compacted" : "standard"); > return; -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-09-25 15:10 [PATCH 0/6] Support XSAVES supervisor states Yu-cheng Yu 2019-09-25 15:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/fpu/xstate: Fix small issues before adding supervisor xstates Yu-cheng Yu 2019-10-09 15:58 ` Borislav Petkov 2019-11-22 21:22 ` Yu-cheng Yu 2019-11-22 21:54 ` Borislav Petkov 2019-09-25 15:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/fpu/xstate: Define new macros for supervisor and user xstates Yu-cheng Yu 2019-10-09 16:17 ` Borislav Petkov 2019-09-25 15:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/fpu/xstate: Separate user and supervisor xfeatures mask Yu-cheng Yu 2019-10-09 16:59 ` Borislav Petkov [this message] 2019-09-25 15:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce XSAVES supervisor states Yu-cheng Yu 2019-10-09 17:10 ` Borislav Petkov 2019-09-25 15:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86/fpu/xstate: Define new functions for clearing fpregs and xstates Yu-cheng Yu 2019-10-09 17:28 ` Borislav Petkov 2019-09-25 15:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/fpu/xstate: Rename validate_xstate_header() to validate_xstate_header_from_user() Yu-cheng Yu 2019-10-09 17:31 ` Borislav Petkov 2019-10-09 22:10 ` Yu-cheng Yu
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20191009165921.GG10395@zn.tnic \ --to=bp@alien8.de \ --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \ --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \ --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \ --cc=hpa@zytor.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=luto@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \ --cc=riel@surriel.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0 lkml/git/0.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1 lkml/git/1.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2 lkml/git/2.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/3 lkml/git/3.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4 lkml/git/4.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5 lkml/git/5.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6 lkml/git/6.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7 lkml/git/7.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8 lkml/git/8.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/9 lkml/git/9.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml \ linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org public-inbox-index lkml Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git