linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@lemonage.de>
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jilayne Lovejoy <opensource@jilayne.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Steve Winslow <swinslow@gmail.com>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/7] nfc: pn533: add uart phy driver
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 17:29:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191009172907.2f0877f4@cakuba.netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191008140544.17112-1-poeschel@lemonage.de>

On Tue,  8 Oct 2019 16:05:37 +0200, Lars Poeschel wrote:
> The purpose of this patch series is to add a uart phy driver to the
> pn533 nfc driver.
> It first changes the dt strings and docs. The dt compatible strings
> need to change, because I would add "pn532-uart" to the already
> existing "pn533-i2c" one. These two are now unified into just
> "pn532". Then the neccessary changes to the pn533 core driver are
> made. Then the uart phy is added.
> As the pn532 chip supports a autopoll, I wanted to use this instead
> of the software poll loop in the pn533 core driver. It is added and
> activated by the last to patches.
> The way to add the autopoll later in seperate patches is chosen, to
> show, that the uart phy driver can also work with the software poll
> loop, if someone needs that for some reason.
> This patchset is already rebased on Johans "NFC: pn533: fix
> use-after-free and memleaks" patch
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20191007164059.5927-1-johan@kernel.org/
> as they would conflict.
> If for some reason Johans patch will not get merged, I can of course
> provide the patchset without depending on this patch.

The memleak patch was a fix and it's on its way to the current 5.4-rc
releases - therefore it was merged into the net tree. Your set adds
support for a new bus, and will go into the net-next tree.

It'd be best if you reposted once the net tree was merged into the
net-next tree (which usually happens every week or two). If you'd
rather not wait you need to rebase on top of the current net-next tree,
and maintainers will handle the conflicts.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-10  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-08 14:05 [PATCH v9 0/7] nfc: pn533: add uart phy driver Lars Poeschel
2019-10-08 14:05 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] nfc: pn533: i2c: "pn532" as dt compatible string Lars Poeschel
2019-10-08 14:05 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] nfc: pn532: Add uart phy docs and rename it Lars Poeschel
2019-10-09 19:36   ` Rob Herring
2019-10-08 14:05 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] nfc: pn533: Add dev_up/dev_down hooks to phy_ops Lars Poeschel
2019-10-08 14:05 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] nfc: pn533: Split pn533 init & nfc_register Lars Poeschel
2019-10-10  0:40   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-10-15  9:51     ` Lars Poeschel
2019-10-15 16:16       ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-10-16  8:42         ` Lars Poeschel
2019-10-08 14:05 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] nfc: pn533: add UART phy driver Lars Poeschel
2019-10-08 14:05 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] nfc: pn533: Add autopoll capability Lars Poeschel
2019-10-08 14:05 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] nfc: pn532_uart: Make use of pn532 autopoll Lars Poeschel
2019-10-10  0:29 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2019-10-15  9:54   ` [PATCH v9 0/7] nfc: pn533: add uart phy driver Lars Poeschel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191009172907.2f0877f4@cakuba.netronome.com \
    --to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=allison@lohutok.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=opensource@jilayne.com \
    --cc=poeschel@lemonage.de \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=swinslow@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).