From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: "open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT (xtensa)"
<linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xtensa: fix {get,put}_user() for 64bit values
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 02:56:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191010015606.GD26530@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMo8BfKUOmExGRMaUPmcRsy=iyRrguLF6JOLUMegNnzkF9vcvQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:38:12PM -0700, Max Filippov wrote:
> There's also the following code in the callers of this macro, e.g. in
> __get_user_nocheck:
>
> long __gu_err, __gu_val; \
> __get_user_size(__gu_val, (ptr), (size), __gu_err); \
> (x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val; \
>
> the last line is important for sizes 1..4, because it takes care of
> sign extension of the value loaded by the assembly.
> At the same time the first line doesn't make sense for the size 8
> as it will result in value truncation.
Right you are...
> + long __gu_err; \
> + __typeof__(*(ptr) + 0) __gu_val; \
What would __u64 __gu_val; end up with for smaller sizes? I don't have
xtensa cross-toolchain at the moment, so I can't check it easily;
what does =r constraint generate in such case?
Another thing is, you want to zero it on failure, to avoid an uninitialized
value ending up someplace interesting....
> @@ -198,7 +200,7 @@ do {
> \
> case 1: __get_user_asm(x, ptr, retval, 1, "l8ui", __cb); break;\
> case 2: __get_user_asm(x, ptr, retval, 2, "l16ui", __cb); break;\
> case 4: __get_user_asm(x, ptr, retval, 4, "l32i", __cb); break;\
> - case 8: retval = __copy_from_user(&x, ptr, 8); break; \
> + case 8: retval = __copy_from_user(&x, ptr, 8) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> break; \
> default: (x) = __get_user_bad(); \
> } \
> } while (0)
>
> Here __typeof__(*(ptr) + 0) makes enough room for all cases
> in the __get_user_size and the "+0" part takes care of pointers
> to const data.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-10 1:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-09 19:21 [PATCH] xtensa: fix {get,put}_user() for 64bit values Al Viro
2019-10-10 1:38 ` Max Filippov
2019-10-10 1:56 ` Al Viro [this message]
2019-10-10 2:11 ` Max Filippov
2019-10-10 14:29 ` Al Viro
2019-10-11 3:35 ` Max Filippov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191010015606.GD26530@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).